Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 803995" data-attributes="member: 7701">I am probably the one and only DM at all of ENWorld that prefers it if the disagreeing player brings it up right at that moment, during the game.For me, I *hate* to shaft my players. Hate it. So I have no problem when a player points to the relevant section of the PHB and says, "no, it's like this". In fact, I encourage my players to be "PHB lawyers".However, I do have a couple of caveats. If you aren't ready with the right page of the PHB, too bad for you - you'll have to wait until after the session if you want to bring it up. Further, I will ignore *and* change to the player's detriment if he/she ever disagrees with a ruling that is from the DMG or MM (or other DM's book). Those books are not their domain during the session. (That's all theoretical, though, as no player has ever done that IMC.)That's just my group, and we differ wildly from most people out there. But it works for us, as we have a blast and haven't had a single argument about anything, much less a rules argument, in more than 5 years...</blockquote>