Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 8766219" data-attributes="member: 59816">I've recently come to the conclusion that it's not just me that doesn't like high-level play. It's that high-level play is poorly designed. It's not just poorly supported. It's not supported because it's not very good.Now, there ought not to be any reason why this needs to be the case. I played all the way to level 30 in 4e, and while it needed some tweaking (I halved all monsters HP and doubled their damage output) to keep it from being a slog, it still worked and was fun.I've played ONE encounter at L20 in 5e, and it was a bit of a mess. Too many fiddly bits.My point here is (and even if you disagree with the above, I don't think you'll disagree with this): Above Level 10 needs to be completely re-thought out. Or at least, ALMOST completely. And then it needs some good adventures written for it.</blockquote>