Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do you not like about M&M?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swrushing" data-source="post: 2093367" data-attributes="member: 14140"><p>I dislike the way flaws and weaknesses are done. Points upfront for these (loan shark method) simply creates more headaches than it solves.</p><p></p><p>I much prefer having flaws/weaknesses pay as you go, giving bonus XP after they create a noticeable problem in play. this way, you use hindsight to see what they did and not foresight to guess what they might do. This way they can be as severe and frequent or as minimal and infrequent as you wan't since their payback will be determined by these things as they occur. This way put both player and Gm on the same page as both see "the flaw occurs in play" as the good side, the thing that earns the bonus xp, as opposed to the player after he banks the initial loan never wanting to see his flaw come to collect and the GM put in the role of collector. Finally, the Gm does not need to worry about "working the flaw in, but not too often" because he gave the character so many points up front. However often it plays, it pays. The system works for your game, as opposed to you working your game over for the system.</p><p></p><p>I doubt MnM will move in this direction, since they just overhauled flaws in the annual to go even further along the loan shark method, but it would be nice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swrushing, post: 2093367, member: 14140"] I dislike the way flaws and weaknesses are done. Points upfront for these (loan shark method) simply creates more headaches than it solves. I much prefer having flaws/weaknesses pay as you go, giving bonus XP after they create a noticeable problem in play. this way, you use hindsight to see what they did and not foresight to guess what they might do. This way they can be as severe and frequent or as minimal and infrequent as you wan't since their payback will be determined by these things as they occur. This way put both player and Gm on the same page as both see "the flaw occurs in play" as the good side, the thing that earns the bonus xp, as opposed to the player after he banks the initial loan never wanting to see his flaw come to collect and the GM put in the role of collector. Finally, the Gm does not need to worry about "working the flaw in, but not too often" because he gave the character so many points up front. However often it plays, it pays. The system works for your game, as opposed to you working your game over for the system. I doubt MnM will move in this direction, since they just overhauled flaws in the annual to go even further along the loan shark method, but it would be nice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do you not like about M&M?
Top