Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do YOU plan on doing with Daggerheart?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 9691337" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>It's the games tones and presentations. They may have similar rule sets, but are presented in very different ways. And the way that 4e was presented was not appealing to me. </p><p></p><p>Look, here's the 4e and 2e dryads:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]409620[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The 4e version, to me, is combat monster. You see this thing, you fight. It's a tree with boobs attacking you! Did you <em>have </em>to fight when you saw a 4e dryad? No, of course not--but you wouldn't know it from the illustration, information, or flavor text. You had to know it from previous editions or from mythology. (that's one of the few problems I have with DH--the adversaries could use a few more sentences of flavor text.)</p><p></p><p>Whereas to me, the 2e version of the dryad is a clearly a nature spirit of some sort. Combat is a possibility, of course, but it's clear that's not her main purpose in either the game or the world. An encounter with her could be violent, could involve fae trickery, or could involve negotiations or diplomacy. The way 3x and 5.14 presented the dryad are similar in their own ways. </p><p></p><p>That's not the only monster I had issues with, but it's definitely one of the most egregious examples I can think of. And I'm not saying that the 4e art is bad, either--it's certainly good enough and evocative enough for what it is, even if the boobs are unnecessary. But it doesn't make me think dryad. </p><p></p><p>And it's not just the dryad. The 4e bard may indeed be the best bard in all of D&D--I don't know, obviously, but I'm willing to accept the possibility--but the fact it <em>wasn't </em>in the main PH indicated to me that that sort of social character wasn't the game's main goal, at least not when it was first released. </p><p></p><p>So that's what I mean. It wasn't (just) the mechanics. It was the way the game presented itself, which was not in a way I wanted to explore. And it's why I like Daggerheart, because they <em>did </em>bring in the exact sort of elements I love.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 9691337, member: 6915329"] It's the games tones and presentations. They may have similar rule sets, but are presented in very different ways. And the way that 4e was presented was not appealing to me. Look, here's the 4e and 2e dryads: [ATTACH type="full" size="613x447"]409620[/ATTACH] The 4e version, to me, is combat monster. You see this thing, you fight. It's a tree with boobs attacking you! Did you [I]have [/I]to fight when you saw a 4e dryad? No, of course not--but you wouldn't know it from the illustration, information, or flavor text. You had to know it from previous editions or from mythology. (that's one of the few problems I have with DH--the adversaries could use a few more sentences of flavor text.) Whereas to me, the 2e version of the dryad is a clearly a nature spirit of some sort. Combat is a possibility, of course, but it's clear that's not her main purpose in either the game or the world. An encounter with her could be violent, could involve fae trickery, or could involve negotiations or diplomacy. The way 3x and 5.14 presented the dryad are similar in their own ways. That's not the only monster I had issues with, but it's definitely one of the most egregious examples I can think of. And I'm not saying that the 4e art is bad, either--it's certainly good enough and evocative enough for what it is, even if the boobs are unnecessary. But it doesn't make me think dryad. And it's not just the dryad. The 4e bard may indeed be the best bard in all of D&D--I don't know, obviously, but I'm willing to accept the possibility--but the fact it [I]wasn't [/I]in the main PH indicated to me that that sort of social character wasn't the game's main goal, at least not when it was first released. So that's what I mean. It wasn't (just) the mechanics. It was the way the game presented itself, which was not in a way I wanted to explore. And it's why I like Daggerheart, because they [I]did [/I]bring in the exact sort of elements I love. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do YOU plan on doing with Daggerheart?
Top