Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 3475362" data-attributes="member: 15538">They already have other options. Let's turn the table: why should they be able to? What about them entitles them to unlimited use metas?Let's take rules zero to the curb and stomp it. Try this: dragonfire adept, feat that gives them extra uses of an ability (since, after all, at will is virtually the same thing as 14,400/day) plus a quicken ability and maximize breath.So the maximize the breath in round one, and quicken it. Now, they still have an action left. Ordinarily, they would have to wait several rounds, but they can now use their breath attack an additional time thanks to a feat. So they do, and breath again, and maximize it again. So in round one, they launch two maximized breaths.I would think that as an at will ability, their breath weapon should be treated similarly to a warlock's blast and work with feats for spell-like abilities (or supernatural, can't remember for the dragonfire adept). The feats already exist; why start introducing weird rules questions just so you can have a feat that has the word "breath" in it? Unlimited metas seems like a potential problem.</blockquote>