Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sagan Darkside" data-source="post: 647973" data-attributes="member: 9270">Agreed. I like Spelljammer a lot and for that exact reason.One of the best campeigns I ever ran was about a planar entity that was slowly devouring crystal spheres- the pc's travelled to many different spheres to gather data/allies/means to confront such a thing. Along the way they got involved in different more &quot;local&quot; matters throughout the spheres.&nbsp;I got to use almost anything from fiction I could think of without blinking an eye on the rational limitation of it all existing on one planet. Visionaires and gelflings are the first ones that come to mind.I think the complaint about the &quot;silly&quot; nature of spelljammer is a bit foolish. I look at Dragonlance, FR, and especially Planescape and I see a lot of silliness.As with most campeign bits- it is only silly if used in a silly manner.SD</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sagan Darkside, post: 647973, member: 9270"] Agreed. I like Spelljammer a lot and for that exact reason. One of the best campeigns I ever ran was about a planar entity that was slowly devouring crystal spheres- the pc's travelled to many different spheres to gather data/allies/means to confront such a thing. Along the way they got involved in different more "local" matters throughout the spheres. I got to use almost anything from fiction I could think of without blinking an eye on the rational limitation of it all existing on one planet. Visionaires and gelflings are the first ones that come to mind. I think the complaint about the "silly" nature of spelljammer is a bit foolish. I look at Dragonlance, FR, and especially Planescape and I see a lot of silliness. As with most campeign bits- it is only silly if used in a silly manner. SD [/QUOTE]

Verification