Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you think of the 4E background to demons & devils?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 3795846" data-attributes="member: 18832"><p>Consider the change on its own terms, for a moment.</p><p></p><p>1) Devils and demons, as categories of monster, are being overhauled. Devils are conceived of as primarily humanoid in appearance, demons are nonhumanoid.</p><p></p><p>2) The succubus and erinyes are both humanoid, female fiends whose primary purpose is seduction of mortals.</p><p></p><p>3) Devils are conceived of as laying plans to tempt and corrupt mortals in order to escape their prison, demons are conceived of as seeking to destroy anything and everything they can get their hands on - not necessarily mindlessly, but such is definitely their goal.</p><p></p><p>4) "Seduction of mortals", while it can "destroy relationships" and the like, is primarily a method by which fiends can "tempt and corrupt".</p><p></p><p>5) The name "succubus" is better associated with the idea of a fiend which seduces mortals than "erinyes", which has no such association outside of <em>D&D</em>'s inaccurate history.</p><p></p><p>6) Therefore, a succubus should be a humanoid female devil whose primary purpose is seduction of mortals.</p><p></p><p>7) <strong>Therefore</strong>, the name "erinyes" can be released from this awkward and unmythological role and saved for a later creature which properly reflects the mythological spirit of vengeance.</p><p></p><p>Yes? I don't think it's that hard to follow. What <strong>you</strong> are complaining about is that succubi and erinyes have always been demons and devils respectively, that you think they should remain that way even if it doesn't make sense according to the new schema, and that if it doesn't make sense according to the new schema it's the schema that should be dropped "just because it's traditional".</p><p></p><p>Forgive me, but I have always loathed the idea of clinging to tradition for no better reason than that it is tradition.</p><p></p><p>Besides, arguing that they should have kept the erinyes as a devil and reimagined her as a proper spirit of vengeance a) ignores that the succubus still doesn't make much sense and b) is just as much a betrayal of the traditional <em>D&D</em> erinyes as anything else. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mhacdebhandia, post: 3795846, member: 18832"] Consider the change on its own terms, for a moment. 1) Devils and demons, as categories of monster, are being overhauled. Devils are conceived of as primarily humanoid in appearance, demons are nonhumanoid. 2) The succubus and erinyes are both humanoid, female fiends whose primary purpose is seduction of mortals. 3) Devils are conceived of as laying plans to tempt and corrupt mortals in order to escape their prison, demons are conceived of as seeking to destroy anything and everything they can get their hands on - not necessarily mindlessly, but such is definitely their goal. 4) "Seduction of mortals", while it can "destroy relationships" and the like, is primarily a method by which fiends can "tempt and corrupt". 5) The name "succubus" is better associated with the idea of a fiend which seduces mortals than "erinyes", which has no such association outside of [i]D&D[/i]'s inaccurate history. 6) Therefore, a succubus should be a humanoid female devil whose primary purpose is seduction of mortals. 7) [b]Therefore[/b], the name "erinyes" can be released from this awkward and unmythological role and saved for a later creature which properly reflects the mythological spirit of vengeance. Yes? I don't think it's that hard to follow. What [b]you[/b] are complaining about is that succubi and erinyes have always been demons and devils respectively, that you think they should remain that way even if it doesn't make sense according to the new schema, and that if it doesn't make sense according to the new schema it's the schema that should be dropped "just because it's traditional". Forgive me, but I have always loathed the idea of clinging to tradition for no better reason than that it is tradition. Besides, arguing that they should have kept the erinyes as a devil and reimagined her as a proper spirit of vengeance a) ignores that the succubus still doesn't make much sense and b) is just as much a betrayal of the traditional [i]D&D[/i] erinyes as anything else. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you think of the 4E background to demons & devils?
Top