Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do you think of WotC's new combat encounter or "Delve" format?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satori01" data-source="post: 3368618" data-attributes="member: 7859"><p>I like the two page format. It is nice to have everything in one encounter. WOTC decided a long time ago that stats for encounters would be consolidated in the back of the module, which I hate.</p><p>It wrecks the flow for me when reading the module, and makes it harder for me to envision the space.</p><p></p><p>The Two Page format of EtCR, while it still is stats in the back, at least lets me get the feel for encounter, and when you have something as massive and 3 dimensional as Castle Ravenloft helps you out.</p><p></p><p>I like the reviews that John Cooper has done. Intellectually anyone that points out that more rigor is needed is doing good works in my book. However you have to keep in mind John came to prominence by being critical, and many of his critiques can be called nit picks.</p><p></p><p>There are stat block errors of course in Ravenloft. There are in every product, there are often, as John himself will admit, stat block errors in Johns own reviews, which I think shows the ease of missing a plus or two here or there. I will not, however, call the omission of such trivial things like the stat modifier to the Survival skill or the Synergy Bonus to Bluff: Acting to be considered a Stat Block error. The monster is not going to use those skills, their inclusion adds nothing, and if WOTC did include those entries it truly would be worse page padding than reprinting a piece of artwork.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satori01, post: 3368618, member: 7859"] I like the two page format. It is nice to have everything in one encounter. WOTC decided a long time ago that stats for encounters would be consolidated in the back of the module, which I hate. It wrecks the flow for me when reading the module, and makes it harder for me to envision the space. The Two Page format of EtCR, while it still is stats in the back, at least lets me get the feel for encounter, and when you have something as massive and 3 dimensional as Castle Ravenloft helps you out. I like the reviews that John Cooper has done. Intellectually anyone that points out that more rigor is needed is doing good works in my book. However you have to keep in mind John came to prominence by being critical, and many of his critiques can be called nit picks. There are stat block errors of course in Ravenloft. There are in every product, there are often, as John himself will admit, stat block errors in Johns own reviews, which I think shows the ease of missing a plus or two here or there. I will not, however, call the omission of such trivial things like the stat modifier to the Survival skill or the Synergy Bonus to Bluff: Acting to be considered a Stat Block error. The monster is not going to use those skills, their inclusion adds nothing, and if WOTC did include those entries it truly would be worse page padding than reprinting a piece of artwork. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do you think of WotC's new combat encounter or "Delve" format?
Top