Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5903223" data-attributes="member: 7006">Legitimate request.&nbsp; But I do not know which way of organization is better or will be seen as more popular...Two monster books with the same 10 monsters types appearing in each book, but the second book being variations of the first.Or two monster books each with 5 monster types with 2 variations each.You could do it both ways (and obviously I'm condensing numbers down for effect), but it's up in the air which way is better.&nbsp; Personally... based on how fast I go through monsters in a typical campaign... I'd rather have version two.&nbsp; Give me a smaller sample of monsters up front with several different variations of each, and then a second book of all-new monsters 6 months down the road.&nbsp; Because odd-are... I'm never going to be able to come close to using all the monster types in the first book anyway.&nbsp; So having the bullette in the first MM is of much less use than a second orc stat block.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5903223, member: 7006"] Legitimate request. But I do not know which way of organization is better or will be seen as more popular... Two monster books with the same 10 monsters types appearing in each book, but the second book being variations of the first. Or two monster books each with 5 monster types with 2 variations each. You could do it both ways (and obviously I'm condensing numbers down for effect), but it's up in the air which way is better. Personally... based on how fast I go through monsters in a typical campaign... I'd rather have version two. Give me a smaller sample of monsters up front with several different variations of each, and then a second book of all-new monsters 6 months down the road. Because odd-are... I'm never going to be able to come close to using all the monster types in the first book anyway. So having the bullette in the first MM is of much less use than a second orc stat block. [/QUOTE]

Verification