Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ART!" data-source="post: 8665153" data-attributes="member: 79926">I see what you mean about the colors guiding the eye, and I agree. The one caveat is that it's easy to get into too many colors, which can be visually confusing. It's a bit of tightrope.Yeah, red is always a good idea for getting things to stand out, and I like the simplicity of those progressions. You also have to be careful about having too much of that on a page. Some of the best design advice I ever heard was "highlighting everything is the same as highlighting nothing". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />All of those are good ways to distinguish one type of information from another, both within a single table but throughout the book in general. For instance, a race-related sidebar could have the same background as the color used on the edge of the pages in the race chapter.Your English seems fine to me!That Grim Hollow book looks almost exactly like a WOTC 5E book to me, but I do like the look of that timeline in the Symbaroum sample. The Witcher book is really neat-looking, and it's distinctly more image-focused than any 5E book. As a very visual person, I'm down with that, and in the world we live in maybe that's a better approach?</blockquote>