Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 6565627" data-attributes="member: 15700">Same here.  Often in the context of a selling point.  The implication from Tony that people classifying it as such do only as to justify their hatred of 4e seems really odd.  Heck, even for people like me who don't like 4e because it's feels way too much like a tactical boardgame, it doesn't mean I hate it.  I just don't prefer it.There's always this weird commentary that always pops up that you have to either like 4e, or you must be an irrational hater of it.  Often partnered with comments that any criticism of 4e is taken as personal attacks by it's fans.  That's just really weird to me to see it come up all the time.  Maybe it's just because it's the most recently displaced game, and the same thing happened when 3e went away, and when 2e went away, etc.</blockquote>