Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 2915203" data-attributes="member: 3929">I'm down with charging for services, and down with capitalism in-game. But if the wizard thinks his services are worth a few hundred extra gp, then I'd make it clear to him in game that my services are worth serious gp too. If an agreeable arrangement couldn't be made twixt him, me and the caravan master (who I imagine would love to have some 10th level guys protecting him) concerning exorbanant pearl component costs, I'd offer my services elsewhere. Truly, I'd try to make it reasonable, but 300 gp for a 1st level spell ain't.Shoot, a scroll of Identify only costs 125!If that's the case, they should share what wealth they already have.And you'd better confer with your players to make sure your LG is what they think LG is. If you've had communication problems over starting wealth, then alignment, a much stickier subject, is ripe for problems.I thought it likely so. What are they exactly?As befits folks whose primary stat is INT. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>