Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+] What does a non-spellcaster Psion need/look like?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9786052" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>At least for my part, I see psionic and primal as equally distinct things--and I do see primal as quite distinct from the self, because of many of the symbols and rituals involved with it.</p><p></p><p>Primal magic involves a kind of transcendental understanding, it's just not the kind of understanding that can be communicated through <em>text</em>. That's something that both arcane and divine magic share: they are communication, from one entity to another. Primal magic isn't about communication, but <em>immersion</em>.</p><p></p><p>While for you, man is an animal and thus just as much part of these things as everything else, I don't quite see it that way. Instinct is something difficult to understand--yes, humans <em>have</em> instincts, but a lot of them are pretty weak and minor compared to what other animals possess. When you then enhance that conceptual space with supernatural power--where instinct can <em>literally be</em> magic, itself--then learning from and drawing on the instinctual-supernatural can be outside of the self, without being <em>totally other</em> to the self, the way arcane or divine magic implicitly are.</p><p></p><p>If you like, you could say that I divide these four kinds of magic into a grid: "foreign" vs "innate" (arcane/divine are "foreign" to the self, coming from observation or revelation, psionic/primal are "innate" to the self, being the mind and the body), and "analytical" vs "intuitive" (arcane/psi are analytical, divine/primal are intuitive). Psi is, in this sense, most different from divine because it differs on both axes.</p><p></p><p>(This is also probably the point where I should note that I'd <em>prefer</em> that all four types--arcane, divine, primal, psionic--have to <em>some</em> degree distinct mechanical expression and result, significantly more than what D&D 5e has ended up doing, where they're all functionally 100% the same and differ almost exclusively in pure-fluff descriptive text. Since arcane/divine sailed long ago and 5.5e tripled down on "primal is literally just a different spell list" too, psi is the only remaining axis upon which some kind of differentiation can still be present.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9786052, member: 6790260"] At least for my part, I see psionic and primal as equally distinct things--and I do see primal as quite distinct from the self, because of many of the symbols and rituals involved with it. Primal magic involves a kind of transcendental understanding, it's just not the kind of understanding that can be communicated through [I]text[/I]. That's something that both arcane and divine magic share: they are communication, from one entity to another. Primal magic isn't about communication, but [I]immersion[/I]. While for you, man is an animal and thus just as much part of these things as everything else, I don't quite see it that way. Instinct is something difficult to understand--yes, humans [I]have[/I] instincts, but a lot of them are pretty weak and minor compared to what other animals possess. When you then enhance that conceptual space with supernatural power--where instinct can [I]literally be[/I] magic, itself--then learning from and drawing on the instinctual-supernatural can be outside of the self, without being [I]totally other[/I] to the self, the way arcane or divine magic implicitly are. If you like, you could say that I divide these four kinds of magic into a grid: "foreign" vs "innate" (arcane/divine are "foreign" to the self, coming from observation or revelation, psionic/primal are "innate" to the self, being the mind and the body), and "analytical" vs "intuitive" (arcane/psi are analytical, divine/primal are intuitive). Psi is, in this sense, most different from divine because it differs on both axes. (This is also probably the point where I should note that I'd [I]prefer[/I] that all four types--arcane, divine, primal, psionic--have to [I]some[/I] degree distinct mechanical expression and result, significantly more than what D&D 5e has ended up doing, where they're all functionally 100% the same and differ almost exclusively in pure-fluff descriptive text. Since arcane/divine sailed long ago and 5.5e tripled down on "primal is literally just a different spell list" too, psi is the only remaining axis upon which some kind of differentiation can still be present.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+] What does a non-spellcaster Psion need/look like?
Top