Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What does "Always" mean with regards to alignment descriptions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 4726253" data-attributes="member: 14159"><p>Personally, I would call 90% an overwhelming majority. If 90% of the public agreed on an issue, the term "overwhelming majority" would probably be used in the media.</p><p></p><p>The way I see it, any intelligent, free-willed being has some flexibility in alignment. Now, by genetics they might have a tendency to certain behaviors (just as certain breeds of dogs are known for being more friendly, or more hostile, like that but moreso since all dogs have Neutral alignment), and culture goes a long way (being raised in the Cult of Tiamat is probably not conducive to developing a Good alignment), it's not like it's inherent to the creature itself.</p><p></p><p>For a creature that is "Always Chaotic Evil" like some types of Dragon. I'd say that 90% are Chaotic Evil, 4% are Chaotic Neutral, 4% are Neutral Evil, 1.5% are either Neutral Good, True Neutral or Lawful Neutral, and 0.5% are Lawful Good. Therefore by far, most of them are Chaotic Evil, and most of the ones that aren't are only one "step" away (and for most intents and purposes, PC's won't notice the difference between a Neutral Evil and Chaotic Evil dragon, or even a True Neutral dragon if it's only one encounter and the dragon has a reason to be hostile like armed adventurers kicking down the door to his lair), and dragons that have alignments so different that their behavior would clearly stand out as abnormal would be pretty rare indeed (and PC's used to dragons ).</p><p></p><p>Now, I personally voted for the first option, but almost third option. Fiends are just plain evil by nature and undead rely on a force that is destruction incarnate and naturally affiliated with evil to exist. Fiends are evil physically incarnate, and exceptions for those are far rarer than anything else (and exceptions for undead are only a little more common). Now, there are a handful of possible exceptions of a redeemed fiend (or fallen celestial) in existing canon so it's possible (but far more unlikely than a Good Orc, or a Good Dragon, or even a Good Illithid), or the cliche of the "good vampire", but they are so rare that you could count all the ones in existence on one hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingsandsword, post: 4726253, member: 14159"] Personally, I would call 90% an overwhelming majority. If 90% of the public agreed on an issue, the term "overwhelming majority" would probably be used in the media. The way I see it, any intelligent, free-willed being has some flexibility in alignment. Now, by genetics they might have a tendency to certain behaviors (just as certain breeds of dogs are known for being more friendly, or more hostile, like that but moreso since all dogs have Neutral alignment), and culture goes a long way (being raised in the Cult of Tiamat is probably not conducive to developing a Good alignment), it's not like it's inherent to the creature itself. For a creature that is "Always Chaotic Evil" like some types of Dragon. I'd say that 90% are Chaotic Evil, 4% are Chaotic Neutral, 4% are Neutral Evil, 1.5% are either Neutral Good, True Neutral or Lawful Neutral, and 0.5% are Lawful Good. Therefore by far, most of them are Chaotic Evil, and most of the ones that aren't are only one "step" away (and for most intents and purposes, PC's won't notice the difference between a Neutral Evil and Chaotic Evil dragon, or even a True Neutral dragon if it's only one encounter and the dragon has a reason to be hostile like armed adventurers kicking down the door to his lair), and dragons that have alignments so different that their behavior would clearly stand out as abnormal would be pretty rare indeed (and PC's used to dragons ). Now, I personally voted for the first option, but almost third option. Fiends are just plain evil by nature and undead rely on a force that is destruction incarnate and naturally affiliated with evil to exist. Fiends are evil physically incarnate, and exceptions for those are far rarer than anything else (and exceptions for undead are only a little more common). Now, there are a handful of possible exceptions of a redeemed fiend (or fallen celestial) in existing canon so it's possible (but far more unlikely than a Good Orc, or a Good Dragon, or even a Good Illithid), or the cliche of the "good vampire", but they are so rare that you could count all the ones in existence on one hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What does "Always" mean with regards to alignment descriptions?
Top