Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What does "Always" mean with regards to alignment descriptions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4726392" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>If just 10% of the population are in rebellion, a society collapses. You don't say 'the overwhelming majority of people are right handed'. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but the media are such complete idiots I could rest my case with that alone.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Err... first of all, that's not true. There are a number of cases where we could have an intelligent, free-willed being be certainly constant in their alignment. All we have to do is assume that the creature has non-human attributes. For example, the creature might possess perfect violition - meaning that unlike me and you it never fails to do what it wants to do because some part of its being rebels and decides to watch TV instead of say studying for that exam it really wants to pass. Such a being would have a constancy of behavior that humans wouldn't have, in that it would truly always be acting to achieve the thing it wants most. Or for example, the being could be so intelligent that it always sees the end results of its actions, and hense despite having free will always chooses to do the same thing every time even knowing the outcome. Such a being never has regrets. Once its chosen something based on its desires, it always chooses that same thing. Or we might have an intelligent being that has an emotional and goal structure utterly incomprihensible to humans. For example, the being might be literally physically incapable of feeling tenderness or sympathy for anything. It's still has free will, and could choose to be nice, but it never actually desires to be nice, and so never actually chooses it. Or again, it might be phyisically impossible for a creature to become angry, as the necessary mental path ways simply didn't exist. However provoked, it might never desire to lash back. If you punched it, it might apologize for putting its face in front of your hand. If you did it again, it might realize that for some unfathomable (to it) reason you were trying to put your fist forcibly in its face and try to evade, but it would never desire to strike back in return because it lacked any emotional basis for doing so. Such a being is fully intelligent. It could explain its thinking and motivations to you, but you'd never (as a human) really be able to understand how it felt because any attempt to put yourself in its shoes would result in an error of reasoning.</p><p></p><p>Which is effectively the error I think you are making here - trying to put yourself in 'the Dragon's Shoes' as if the dragon and everything else in the universe that did or might exist worked, thinked, and felt just like you do.</p><p></p><p>But even if I can't convince you of that, consider what you are saying again with a different emphasis:</p><p></p><p> - emphasis mine</p><p></p><p>Any in that context means 'every'. So what you are arguing is things are most logical (and presumably most interesting, since its our imagination at play here) when there is no diversity. Everything is just exactly the same, and fundamentally acts and thinks like a human regardless of shape, regardless of biology, regardless of spiritual origin.</p><p></p><p>I find that utterly unfathomable. The idea that in the full range of not only what could exist in this crazily huge universe, but in any imaginable universe, everything would be basically human in nature and demeanor strikes me as utterly unbelievable.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's an imaginary creature, so there is no wrong answer here, but I'd put those numbers too high by a factor of at least a 100 in the case of one step removed from the main alignment, and by a factor of more than a million in the case of the opposite alignment. In the case of a planeborn creature, even that level of frequency would be too high for me, but we at least seem to agree on that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4726392, member: 4937"] If just 10% of the population are in rebellion, a society collapses. You don't say 'the overwhelming majority of people are right handed'. Yes, but the media are such complete idiots I could rest my case with that alone. Err... first of all, that's not true. There are a number of cases where we could have an intelligent, free-willed being be certainly constant in their alignment. All we have to do is assume that the creature has non-human attributes. For example, the creature might possess perfect violition - meaning that unlike me and you it never fails to do what it wants to do because some part of its being rebels and decides to watch TV instead of say studying for that exam it really wants to pass. Such a being would have a constancy of behavior that humans wouldn't have, in that it would truly always be acting to achieve the thing it wants most. Or for example, the being could be so intelligent that it always sees the end results of its actions, and hense despite having free will always chooses to do the same thing every time even knowing the outcome. Such a being never has regrets. Once its chosen something based on its desires, it always chooses that same thing. Or we might have an intelligent being that has an emotional and goal structure utterly incomprihensible to humans. For example, the being might be literally physically incapable of feeling tenderness or sympathy for anything. It's still has free will, and could choose to be nice, but it never actually desires to be nice, and so never actually chooses it. Or again, it might be phyisically impossible for a creature to become angry, as the necessary mental path ways simply didn't exist. However provoked, it might never desire to lash back. If you punched it, it might apologize for putting its face in front of your hand. If you did it again, it might realize that for some unfathomable (to it) reason you were trying to put your fist forcibly in its face and try to evade, but it would never desire to strike back in return because it lacked any emotional basis for doing so. Such a being is fully intelligent. It could explain its thinking and motivations to you, but you'd never (as a human) really be able to understand how it felt because any attempt to put yourself in its shoes would result in an error of reasoning. Which is effectively the error I think you are making here - trying to put yourself in 'the Dragon's Shoes' as if the dragon and everything else in the universe that did or might exist worked, thinked, and felt just like you do. But even if I can't convince you of that, consider what you are saying again with a different emphasis: - emphasis mine Any in that context means 'every'. So what you are arguing is things are most logical (and presumably most interesting, since its our imagination at play here) when there is no diversity. Everything is just exactly the same, and fundamentally acts and thinks like a human regardless of shape, regardless of biology, regardless of spiritual origin. I find that utterly unfathomable. The idea that in the full range of not only what could exist in this crazily huge universe, but in any imaginable universe, everything would be basically human in nature and demeanor strikes me as utterly unbelievable. It's an imaginary creature, so there is no wrong answer here, but I'd put those numbers too high by a factor of at least a 100 in the case of one step removed from the main alignment, and by a factor of more than a million in the case of the opposite alignment. In the case of a planeborn creature, even that level of frequency would be too high for me, but we at least seem to agree on that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What does "Always" mean with regards to alignment descriptions?
Top