Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 7158244" data-attributes="member: 6785785">Sure...but that isn't going to happen. I think overall balance should be kept in mind in all aspects of game design, but I don't think balance is the goal. I tend to agree with the meaningful choices take...I like that idea, and certainly think it's silly when there is an option that is clearly so inferior to all other choices so as to never be selected. But again, this is one definition or angle. Sure it is. Sure....and when some choices are effectively the same, they also stop mattering. This is why I would say balance should be kept in mind, but not be the overall goal. I know you were directing this question to someone else, but I have an answer to offer.I don't think it's wrong in any way to have criticisms of the edition....to say this or that doesn't work for me is fine. However, to call for the approach to change seems odd. If there is a problem for you, then you have the ability to correct it, especially given this edition's particular approach. But to act as if the designers have failed in some way, and deserve admonishment or that they owe it to anyone to fix things for them, seems odd.</blockquote>