Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SpikeyFreak" data-source="post: 90157" data-attributes="member: 705">This thread just won the Most Confusing Thread Award, and I think kreynolds should be the reicipient.My problem with the whole &quot;not cumulative with&quot; thing is that I think they meant that you should NOT be able to get an extra attack from both speed and haste in the same round, but that's NOT what it says.If you really go by what it says, you get either an extra attack from a speed weapon or an extra partial action from haste, which is just silly.&nbsp; I attacked on extra time because I have a +4 enhancement on my weapon, but I can't use haste now.Right now, I'm considering it a house rule, but I'm playing it as&nbsp; you can benefit from both the same round, but you can't get an attack from a speed weapon on a haste partial action.--Proud SpikeyEdit: you miss one little NOT and what you meant to say just goes flying out the window....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SpikeyFreak, post: 90157, member: 705"] This thread just won the Most Confusing Thread Award, and I think kreynolds should be the reicipient. My problem with the whole "not cumulative with" thing is that I think they meant that you should NOT be able to get an extra attack from both speed and haste in the same round, but that's NOT what it says. If you really go by what it says, you get either an extra attack from a speed weapon or an extra partial action from haste, which is just silly. I attacked on extra time because I have a +4 enhancement on my weapon, but I can't use haste now. Right now, I'm considering it a house rule, but I'm playing it as you can benefit from both the same round, but you can't get an attack from a speed weapon on a haste partial action. --Proud Spikey Edit: you miss one little NOT and what you meant to say just goes flying out the window.... [/QUOTE]

Verification