Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7601703" data-attributes="member: 16814">Thus seems like you're trying to smear one thing into another.&nbsp; On one hand, there's the limited authority of the player to use ingame resources to acquire equipment that is persistent until expended.&nbsp; On the other, there's a suggestion that a player can freely add to the environment new fictional elements that modify the GM's narration of scene.Your argument seems to be a smearing of the limited authority allowed to the accumlation of equipment to wholesale ability to propose new fiction into the scene.&nbsp; You do this be claiming that a character pulling rope from a backpack is also a proposal of new fiction into the scene, but this fails because the rope, as equipment, was established a priori and is a persistent piece of fiction.&nbsp; No contemporary authoring has occurred.&nbsp; This categorically seperates it ftom the proposal that the guard is an old friend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7601703, member: 16814"] Thus seems like you're trying to smear one thing into another. On one hand, there's the limited authority of the player to use ingame resources to acquire equipment that is persistent until expended. On the other, there's a suggestion that a player can freely add to the environment new fictional elements that modify the GM's narration of scene. Your argument seems to be a smearing of the limited authority allowed to the accumlation of equipment to wholesale ability to propose new fiction into the scene. You do this be claiming that a character pulling rope from a backpack is also a proposal of new fiction into the scene, but this fails because the rope, as equipment, was established a priori and is a persistent piece of fiction. No contemporary authoring has occurred. This categorically seperates it ftom the proposal that the guard is an old friend. [/QUOTE]

Verification