Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8484770" data-attributes="member: 42582">[USER=1282]@darkbard[/USER], thanks for the reply.To build further, and more provocatively - not necessarily provoking you, but more referring to the content of the thread as a whole:What do you think of my remark upthread?I think what I've posted is consistent with at least this much of your most recent post:One reason I think this question is provocative is this:If we think about what gets called &quot;neo-trad&quot; play - at least as I understand it - the background/setting/context has been pre-authored (by the GM or module writer or whomever). And the character has been pre-authored, the background/setting/context being a &quot;stage&quot; on which the character conception is portrayed and fully realised. But not discovered.If that abstract characterisation is fair, then what is the scope of the play-generated shared fiction in neo-trad play? It starts to seem quite narrow.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8484770, member: 42582"] [USER=1282]@darkbard[/USER], thanks for the reply. To build further, and more provocatively - not necessarily provoking you, but more referring to the content of the thread as a whole: What do you think of my remark upthread? [indent][/indent]I think what I've posted is consistent with at least this much of your most recent post: One reason I think this question is provocative is this: If we think about what gets called "neo-trad" play - at least as I understand it - the background/setting/context has been pre-authored (by the GM or module writer or whomever). And the character has been pre-authored, the background/setting/context being a "stage" on which the character conception is portrayed and fully realised. [i]But not discovered.[/i] If that abstract characterisation is fair, then what is the scope of the [i]play-generated[/i] shared fiction in neo-trad play? It starts to seem quite narrow. [/QUOTE]

Verification