Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What Does "Simulation" Mean To You? [+]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9813130" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>Various people upthread have done a fine job of defining simulation in the same (or better!) terms that I'd use, which means I don't have to type it all out. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>In short (yeah, right!) and in summary, then, simulation to me represents a collection of elements mostly around relatability:</p><p></p><p>--- internal consistency within the setting*. That is to say, if something works in a particular way once then there's a reasonable expectation that, barring external influences, it'll work that way every time.</p><p>--- enough relatability to the real world that players can immediately grasp the basic stuff (gravity, time, weather, tides, human setting inhabitants, etc.) because they already have experience with those things in reality. Further, if any of those basic elements are to be inherently different in the setting (e.g. there's no gravity, or the weather never changes, or the humans are all seven feet tall) those things are clearly communicated up front so as to allow the players to adjust their imaginations accordingly.</p><p>--- using abstraction and rules to as best as possible+ mirror the setting's physics, rather than tweaking the setting's physics to suit the abstraction. And yes, this means that if the setting's physics are to be significantly different from our own, those differences need to be figured out before rules design even begins e.g. if faster-than-light travel is an element of the setting, how do the physics of it actually work.</p><p>--- the ability to explain how and why fantastic things work as they do, or at all, when compared with or added to our own reality; such that players can more easily relate to the fantastic. In other words, the physics of the fantastic get melded in with the physics we already know, thus making the simulation a more-cohesive whole. See above re faster-than-light travel.</p><p></p><p>* - or discrete parts thereof. For example, a D&D party journeying to a different plane of existence should perhaps expect basic things to work differently there than they do at home, while still reasonably expecting that new plane to have its own internal consistency once they become more familiar with the place.</p><p>+ - practicality rears its ugly head, of course, often requiring some trade-offs and compromises between accuracy of sim and ease of playability. This is the bane of anyone who has ever tried to design a deep-sim game. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 9813130, member: 29398"] Various people upthread have done a fine job of defining simulation in the same (or better!) terms that I'd use, which means I don't have to type it all out. :) In short (yeah, right!) and in summary, then, simulation to me represents a collection of elements mostly around relatability: --- internal consistency within the setting*. That is to say, if something works in a particular way once then there's a reasonable expectation that, barring external influences, it'll work that way every time. --- enough relatability to the real world that players can immediately grasp the basic stuff (gravity, time, weather, tides, human setting inhabitants, etc.) because they already have experience with those things in reality. Further, if any of those basic elements are to be inherently different in the setting (e.g. there's no gravity, or the weather never changes, or the humans are all seven feet tall) those things are clearly communicated up front so as to allow the players to adjust their imaginations accordingly. --- using abstraction and rules to as best as possible+ mirror the setting's physics, rather than tweaking the setting's physics to suit the abstraction. And yes, this means that if the setting's physics are to be significantly different from our own, those differences need to be figured out before rules design even begins e.g. if faster-than-light travel is an element of the setting, how do the physics of it actually work. --- the ability to explain how and why fantastic things work as they do, or at all, when compared with or added to our own reality; such that players can more easily relate to the fantastic. In other words, the physics of the fantastic get melded in with the physics we already know, thus making the simulation a more-cohesive whole. See above re faster-than-light travel. * - or discrete parts thereof. For example, a D&D party journeying to a different plane of existence should perhaps expect basic things to work differently there than they do at home, while still reasonably expecting that new plane to have its own internal consistency once they become more familiar with the place. + - practicality rears its ugly head, of course, often requiring some trade-offs and compromises between accuracy of sim and ease of playability. This is the bane of anyone who has ever tried to design a deep-sim game. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What Does "Simulation" Mean To You? [+]
Top