Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="awayfarer" data-source="post: 3379381" data-attributes="member: 42702">Might I ask why? I can't see a reason to justify this unless the character really is a "leader of men" type. A rude, uncharismatic boor of a character wouldn't seem to fit this.Edit: Didn't see your second post. I dunno, I always pictured the fighter as the typical soldier/grunt and not necessarily a leader/general. The paladin or marshal seem more like the natural leader types. Largely I feel like if you were to go the leaderly route, you would want to start at lower level by adding a few social skills. A leader who can't even convince grandma to lend them a quarter doesn't seem very inspiring.</blockquote>