Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What Does the RPG Hobby Need Now?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 9662309" data-attributes="member: 2013"><p>No, I'm not suggesting that we remove experienced players that enjoy many pages of rules.</p><p></p><p>The particular question (among several asked by the OP) that I was attempting to answer was, "What would make it easier for new players to get into the hobby?" What experienced players want/need is mostly irrelevant to answering that question, because, by definition, they are not "new players." <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>The problem <strong>any </strong>group runs into is that there is a natural inflow and outflow of members of the group over time for a multitude of reasons. But any group where the net outflow exceeds the net inflow is destined to (figuratively or literally) die out. If new players aren't coming into the TTRPG hobby, the TTRPG hobby will, over a long enough timespan, eventually die out.</p><p></p><p>However, it is probably not worthwhile to "remove" experienced players from the hobby because I think in most cases, it is easier for new players to onboard while mentored/guided by the experienced players.</p><p></p><p>The general problem I have with any members - or potential members - of a group comes when they insist "everything must be designed for me" (which is especially funny to me because generally our tastes change over time... what got my younger self interested in TTRPGs would be kind of embarrassing to my current self and what keeps my current self interested in TTRPGs would have made my younger self never get into them). I think the current parlance is, "yucking someone else's yum?"</p><p></p><p>Basically, we need some "simple" products if we're going to onboard new RPG'ers. That doesn't mean we ONLY need "simple" products, but it does mean we need existing players to stop being actively hostile towards things like Starter Sets ("I already know how to play the game, stop talking down to me!") and we probably <em>also</em> need existing players to be willing to learn and play (not all the time, but some of the time) some RPGs with simpler mechanics so they can help the next generation find TTRPGs.</p><p></p><p>It's not a perfect analogy, but if Football Fans insisted that Pop Warner Football for 5-year olds had to run the complex offensive and defensive schemes that NFL teams run, we'd see the death of Football in about 30 years, because 5-year olds aren't interested (or indeed, capable) of running those schemes and so there would be no new football players and eventually the ones already involved in the sport would age out. Players have to start simple and over time build the ability to use more complex schemes. NFL players don't despise Pop Warner offenses because they aren't complex enough, they have enough self-awareness to know that this is the foundation upon which NFL offenses will eventually be built.</p><p></p><p>But I often see hostility towards the simple in the TTRPG community (and indeed, many other established communities, and not just in the TTRPG space, this isn't just "our" problem). Let's not kick anyone out, but let's embrace the fact that we need some simple games for people to cut their teeth on before they move on to more complex games. I'm not going to live forever. Once it stops onboarding new participants, any hobby <strong>will </strong>die out within a generation... ask the philatelists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 9662309, member: 2013"] No, I'm not suggesting that we remove experienced players that enjoy many pages of rules. The particular question (among several asked by the OP) that I was attempting to answer was, "What would make it easier for new players to get into the hobby?" What experienced players want/need is mostly irrelevant to answering that question, because, by definition, they are not "new players." ;) The problem [B]any [/B]group runs into is that there is a natural inflow and outflow of members of the group over time for a multitude of reasons. But any group where the net outflow exceeds the net inflow is destined to (figuratively or literally) die out. If new players aren't coming into the TTRPG hobby, the TTRPG hobby will, over a long enough timespan, eventually die out. However, it is probably not worthwhile to "remove" experienced players from the hobby because I think in most cases, it is easier for new players to onboard while mentored/guided by the experienced players. The general problem I have with any members - or potential members - of a group comes when they insist "everything must be designed for me" (which is especially funny to me because generally our tastes change over time... what got my younger self interested in TTRPGs would be kind of embarrassing to my current self and what keeps my current self interested in TTRPGs would have made my younger self never get into them). I think the current parlance is, "yucking someone else's yum?" Basically, we need some "simple" products if we're going to onboard new RPG'ers. That doesn't mean we ONLY need "simple" products, but it does mean we need existing players to stop being actively hostile towards things like Starter Sets ("I already know how to play the game, stop talking down to me!") and we probably [I]also[/I] need existing players to be willing to learn and play (not all the time, but some of the time) some RPGs with simpler mechanics so they can help the next generation find TTRPGs. It's not a perfect analogy, but if Football Fans insisted that Pop Warner Football for 5-year olds had to run the complex offensive and defensive schemes that NFL teams run, we'd see the death of Football in about 30 years, because 5-year olds aren't interested (or indeed, capable) of running those schemes and so there would be no new football players and eventually the ones already involved in the sport would age out. Players have to start simple and over time build the ability to use more complex schemes. NFL players don't despise Pop Warner offenses because they aren't complex enough, they have enough self-awareness to know that this is the foundation upon which NFL offenses will eventually be built. But I often see hostility towards the simple in the TTRPG community (and indeed, many other established communities, and not just in the TTRPG space, this isn't just "our" problem). Let's not kick anyone out, but let's embrace the fact that we need some simple games for people to cut their teeth on before they move on to more complex games. I'm not going to live forever. Once it stops onboarding new participants, any hobby [B]will [/B]die out within a generation... ask the philatelists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What Does the RPG Hobby Need Now?
Top