Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Xeviat" data-source="post: 6944607" data-attributes="member: 57494">Well, we're getting bards tomorrow. Are they going alphabetical? How are the classes already represented, both in official WotC material and UA?Barbarian: 6; 2 PHB, 1 SCAG, 3 UABard: 6; 2 PHB, 2+2 UACleric: 9; 7 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 DMGDruid: 2; 2 PHBFighter: 7; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 3 UA Monk: 5; 3 PHB, 2 SCAGPaladin: 5; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 DMGRanger: 4ish; 2 PHB, 2ish UA (spell-less)Rogue: 6; 3 PHB, 2 SCAG, 1 UA Sorcerer: 5; 2 PHB, 1 SCAG, 2 UAWarlock: 6; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 2 UAWizard: 10; 8 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 UAThe druid could really use some new love. Seasons? A new Moon? An animal companion Druid? I'd love to see 4 new builds, 5 if one is a variant moon druid.The cleric doesn't really need anything, but Protection and some more elements to round out the missing 3E domains might be nice.The fighter is doing reasonably well. I'd like to see a Templar 1/3rd caster, though; Fighter can have more subclasses than the rest. I've been itching to make a Kensai, Fighter/Monk type thing.The monk's sitting pretty good, but they could possibly use something else. Mine Book of Nine Swords for ideas; I'd like a Setting Sun Monk who throws people around.The paladin could use a little.The ranger is lacking some here, but I'm actually drawing a blank on what they could get.The rogue is doing okay, but as a &quot;Basic Class&quot;, they could always get more. I feel everything is reasonably covered, though.The sorcerer has gotten some love, but they're a little behind the 6 that is more standard now.The warlock's gotten a lot of love. I think they're fine for now. Binder-type Warlock would likely be appreciated, though.The wizard is fine. A universalist would be loved, though.So, I think the Druid and Ranger need the most love. The land &quot;domains&quot; aren't different enough to be considered separate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Xeviat, post: 6944607, member: 57494"] Well, we're getting bards tomorrow. Are they going alphabetical? How are the classes already represented, both in official WotC material and UA? Barbarian: 6; 2 PHB, 1 SCAG, 3 UA Bard: 6; 2 PHB, 2+2 UA Cleric: 9; 7 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 DMG Druid: 2; 2 PHB Fighter: 7; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 3 UA Monk: 5; 3 PHB, 2 SCAG Paladin: 5; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 DMG Ranger: 4ish; 2 PHB, 2ish UA (spell-less) Rogue: 6; 3 PHB, 2 SCAG, 1 UA Sorcerer: 5; 2 PHB, 1 SCAG, 2 UA Warlock: 6; 3 PHB, 1 SCAG, 2 UA Wizard: 10; 8 PHB, 1 SCAG, 1 UA The druid could really use some new love. Seasons? A new Moon? An animal companion Druid? I'd love to see 4 new builds, 5 if one is a variant moon druid. The cleric doesn't really need anything, but Protection and some more elements to round out the missing 3E domains might be nice. The fighter is doing reasonably well. I'd like to see a Templar 1/3rd caster, though; Fighter can have more subclasses than the rest. I've been itching to make a Kensai, Fighter/Monk type thing. The monk's sitting pretty good, but they could possibly use something else. Mine Book of Nine Swords for ideas; I'd like a Setting Sun Monk who throws people around. The paladin could use a little. The ranger is lacking some here, but I'm actually drawing a blank on what they could get. The rogue is doing okay, but as a "Basic Class", they could always get more. I feel everything is reasonably covered, though. The sorcerer has gotten some love, but they're a little behind the 6 that is more standard now. The warlock's gotten a lot of love. I think they're fine for now. Binder-type Warlock would likely be appreciated, though. The wizard is fine. A universalist would be loved, though. So, I think the Druid and Ranger need the most love. The land "domains" aren't different enough to be considered separate. [/QUOTE]

Verification