Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bert1001 fka bert1000" data-source="post: 8754711" data-attributes="member: 7029588">Yeah you could build the Fighter so they were actually significantly ahead of all other classes at &quot;winning combat&quot; as a prize for not being able to contibute in the other pillars, but that would be a very different dynamic and I'm not sure one people want anymore.&nbsp;&nbsp; So Fighter gets Combat 10, Exploration 1, Social 1.&nbsp;&nbsp; Wizard gets Combat 5, Exploration 5, Social 5.&nbsp; &nbsp; Rogue gets Combat 3, Exploration 7, Social 10From 3e on people seem to have the expectation that classes all contribute more than just &quot;marginally&quot; to &quot;winning combat&quot; which I think is fair given it's prominance in modern D&amp;D.&nbsp; &nbsp; If other classes get to be 8 or 9 and you get to be 10&nbsp; then it's not enough of a gap to justify your 1s.&nbsp;&nbsp; Some people think the Fighter isn't anywhere near 10 at higher levels anyway so it's even worse of a situation today.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bert1001 fka bert1000, post: 8754711, member: 7029588"] Yeah you [I]could [/I]build the Fighter so they were actually significantly ahead of all other classes at "winning combat" as a prize for not being able to contibute in the other pillars, but that would be a very different dynamic and I'm not sure one people want anymore. So Fighter gets Combat 10, Exploration 1, Social 1. Wizard gets Combat 5, Exploration 5, Social 5. Rogue gets Combat 3, Exploration 7, Social 10 From 3e on people seem to have the expectation that classes all contribute more than just "marginally" to "winning combat" which I think is fair given it's prominance in modern D&D. If other classes get to be 8 or 9 and you get to be 10 then it's not enough of a gap to justify your 1s. Some people think the Fighter isn't anywhere near 10 at higher levels anyway so it's even worse of a situation today. [/QUOTE]

Verification