Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
What Doesn't 4E Do Well?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5064577" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I think that Stephen Schubert might have been the main WotC math geek. He's still there AFAIK.</p><p></p><p>And I really don't think that the core skill challenge (or the to hit / defense, especially lowest NAD) system would have been broken as bad as it was if they had a real mathematician working it. That just doesn't make sense. The assumption that they must have "tweaked the system after the math geek left" seems suspect.</p><p></p><p>Plus, the new skill challenge system (where reasonably trained skilled PCs make moderate primary checks close to 100% of the time) although better, is still obviously not designed by a mathematician. The primary trained skill guys basically always succeed and the secondary trained skill guys (or primary untrained skill guys who are slightly worse) get the lion's share of the failures, but still often succeed 75% or more of the time. This is an exercise in dice rolling where a high complexity moderate skill challenge of 12 successes before 3 failures is really not that hard to accomplish if half of the checks are primary trained and the other half are secondary trained. 4 successes before 3 failures is a total joke for a moderate skill challenge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5064577, member: 2011"] I think that Stephen Schubert might have been the main WotC math geek. He's still there AFAIK. And I really don't think that the core skill challenge (or the to hit / defense, especially lowest NAD) system would have been broken as bad as it was if they had a real mathematician working it. That just doesn't make sense. The assumption that they must have "tweaked the system after the math geek left" seems suspect. Plus, the new skill challenge system (where reasonably trained skilled PCs make moderate primary checks close to 100% of the time) although better, is still obviously not designed by a mathematician. The primary trained skill guys basically always succeed and the secondary trained skill guys (or primary untrained skill guys who are slightly worse) get the lion's share of the failures, but still often succeed 75% or more of the time. This is an exercise in dice rolling where a high complexity moderate skill challenge of 12 successes before 3 failures is really not that hard to accomplish if half of the checks are primary trained and the other half are secondary trained. 4 successes before 3 failures is a total joke for a moderate skill challenge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
What Doesn't 4E Do Well?
Top