Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What ever happened to "role playing?"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bendris Noulg" data-source="post: 1546944" data-attributes="member: 6398"><p>Yep, this would indeed be the heart of the matter. And I would agree if the opposing stance was the role-play is ancillary & unnecessary to play <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em>. All I'm really disagreeing with is the idea that a lack of role-playing still equates to a Role-Playing Game (see my pending reply to Icebear for more on this...).</p><p> </p><p>I think all of this had, to some degree, something to do with it. Indeed, where people are asking us to point out hostility towards role-play, there isn't any (aside from clearly biased posting and moderating practices on the WotC boards, that is). However, there is a completely dismissive approach to role-play, and it's this dismissiveness that fails to promote inclusion to role-play. As the game becomes more popular, you end up with new gamers that don't even consider role-playing or, when considering it, they find the concept greeted with posts relating horror-stories of Shakespearian Thespianism and White Wolf angst and other comments that make the concept appear unappealing, unacceptable, or, at worst, the purview of other game systems, and that this is coming from people that have played the game for years.</p><p> </p><p>Again, though, this is related to my actual experience at the WotC boards. That said, it doesn't surprise me that, here, people are of a completely different view, as their experiences have probably not had this facet of the community rub on them to the point of irritation. Indeed, like I posted earlier, I came here because, aside from 2-3 individuals, this place is far less irritating, and the Ignore function handles those individuals quite nicely. For instance, most of the people of the opposing camp have all posted examples of Diplomacy, Bluff, etc., being used as a means of resolving role-play rather than avoiding it. (I was indeed about to agree with Icebear on that until I saw the Elitist comment, see next post...) This is pretty much how I use them (and posted so earlier in this thread). However, my experience at the WotC boards found that suggesting such usage over there doesn't just get you into a debate, it gets you flamed! Or they just call you a troll just for bringing it up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bendris Noulg, post: 1546944, member: 6398"] Yep, this would indeed be the heart of the matter. And I would agree if the opposing stance was the role-play is ancillary & unnecessary to play [i]Dungeons & Dragons[/i]. All I'm really disagreeing with is the idea that a lack of role-playing still equates to a Role-Playing Game (see my pending reply to Icebear for more on this...). I think all of this had, to some degree, something to do with it. Indeed, where people are asking us to point out hostility towards role-play, there isn't any (aside from clearly biased posting and moderating practices on the WotC boards, that is). However, there is a completely dismissive approach to role-play, and it's this dismissiveness that fails to promote inclusion to role-play. As the game becomes more popular, you end up with new gamers that don't even consider role-playing or, when considering it, they find the concept greeted with posts relating horror-stories of Shakespearian Thespianism and White Wolf angst and other comments that make the concept appear unappealing, unacceptable, or, at worst, the purview of other game systems, and that this is coming from people that have played the game for years. Again, though, this is related to my actual experience at the WotC boards. That said, it doesn't surprise me that, here, people are of a completely different view, as their experiences have probably not had this facet of the community rub on them to the point of irritation. Indeed, like I posted earlier, I came here because, aside from 2-3 individuals, this place is far less irritating, and the Ignore function handles those individuals quite nicely. For instance, most of the people of the opposing camp have all posted examples of Diplomacy, Bluff, etc., being used as a means of resolving role-play rather than avoiding it. (I was indeed about to agree with Icebear on that until I saw the Elitist comment, see next post...) This is pretty much how I use them (and posted so earlier in this thread). However, my experience at the WotC boards found that suggesting such usage over there doesn't just get you into a debate, it gets you flamed! Or they just call you a troll just for bringing it up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What ever happened to "role playing?"
Top