Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What exactly makes Math hard to some people?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 1871490" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Yes. But you see, you need to begin <em>somewhere</em>. At some point you have to assume that something is true. In mathematics, this is called an axiom. Every formal logical system needs them.</p><p></p><p>It is entirely possble to choose axioms which lead to maths that don't describe anything in our real world. However, it is easy enough to pick them so that the math does describe what we see. Right now, though, nobody can tell you <em>why</em> those particular axioms are what work for us. They are a given of the Universe. You must simply accept that they are what do the trick.</p><p></p><p>As an example - at the basis of the number system we use is an axiom which can be stated many different ways, but they all equate to "The empty set exists". There is no way to <em>prove</em> it exists, it must be assumed. The only consolation we can offer is that this assumption leads to the existance fo the computer you type on - not proof that it is true, but reasonably good evidence <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, mathematics has <em>proven</em> that. Kurt Godel proved that within any formal logical system with a finite list of axioms, there will exist true statements that <em>cannot</em> be proven within the system. That is equivalent to saying that not everything in the Universe can be explained off by numbers. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Mind you, the fact that this is true does not mean that a great many things in the Universe can be explained of by numbers. Godel's work is not an excuse for intellectual lazyness. The stuff they teach you in trig, geometry and calculus are well within the realm of things that can be proven, no matter how you dislike it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 1871490, member: 177"] Yes. But you see, you need to begin [i]somewhere[/i]. At some point you have to assume that something is true. In mathematics, this is called an axiom. Every formal logical system needs them. It is entirely possble to choose axioms which lead to maths that don't describe anything in our real world. However, it is easy enough to pick them so that the math does describe what we see. Right now, though, nobody can tell you [i]why[/i] those particular axioms are what work for us. They are a given of the Universe. You must simply accept that they are what do the trick. As an example - at the basis of the number system we use is an axiom which can be stated many different ways, but they all equate to "The empty set exists". There is no way to [i]prove[/i] it exists, it must be assumed. The only consolation we can offer is that this assumption leads to the existance fo the computer you type on - not proof that it is true, but reasonably good evidence :) Actually, mathematics has [i]proven[/i] that. Kurt Godel proved that within any formal logical system with a finite list of axioms, there will exist true statements that [i]cannot[/i] be proven within the system. That is equivalent to saying that not everything in the Universe can be explained off by numbers. :) Mind you, the fact that this is true does not mean that a great many things in the Universe can be explained of by numbers. Godel's work is not an excuse for intellectual lazyness. The stuff they teach you in trig, geometry and calculus are well within the realm of things that can be proven, no matter how you dislike it :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What exactly makes Math hard to some people?
Top