Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
What Games People Are Talking About: A Pie Chart
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 7653143" data-attributes="member: 6701124"><p>This seems like it would be a great source of hundreds of discussion points for a first course in statistics!</p><p></p><p>I think I would actually just avoid talking about the kind of sample you have - you have a non-random convenience sample of some not-well defined larger population. If that population is supposed to be all gamers who post on line then you are suffering from a huge source of bias due to undercoverage because your sampling frame is systematically missing all of the company web-sites. Its even farther away from all gamers. Is it better to just say you have a census of "The most popular independent RPG sites and Blogs"?</p><p></p><p>As far as what you're measuring. You are only getting the count of "people who post about games" if your algorithm only counts the number of distinct posters over the 90 days once each. Further you would need to assume that most people don't have at least two boards they use regularly. You are even farther from getting the number of "people who play each game" (which one of the charts has as a label) since a lot of us seemingly post in threads for systems that aren't related to what we are currently playing. Going with "Most discussed RPGs" like you say in several places seems appropriately nebulous enough that it isn't misleading.</p><p></p><p>And then once you have your sample and a rough research question you get all the arguments about what data is most appropriate. If it's threads, is a one post thread as good as a 1,000 post one? If it's number of posts, what happens when a few 3.5ers who are on-line at the same time manage to crank out 20 pages of posts in a day and a half arguing about wizards versus fighters? If there are lots of PF on-line games and OD&Ders like to play in person should all on-line games be excluded, or are you just going for total on-line traffic about the games? If its threads, how does "All D&D count"? If its post, how does a post talking about 4e as a counter example in a thread about a PF question count? What happens if I don't like the auto-linking ENworld does when I type Pathfinder so that I use PF instead? For posts, how does posting they wish they could give XP count versus actually gettting XP? etc...</p><p></p><p>Hmmmm.... I'm getting more and more glad it isn't my project to run and that I just get to see the cool results. (Which I really enjoy, thanks!).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadence, post: 7653143, member: 6701124"] This seems like it would be a great source of hundreds of discussion points for a first course in statistics! I think I would actually just avoid talking about the kind of sample you have - you have a non-random convenience sample of some not-well defined larger population. If that population is supposed to be all gamers who post on line then you are suffering from a huge source of bias due to undercoverage because your sampling frame is systematically missing all of the company web-sites. Its even farther away from all gamers. Is it better to just say you have a census of "The most popular independent RPG sites and Blogs"? As far as what you're measuring. You are only getting the count of "people who post about games" if your algorithm only counts the number of distinct posters over the 90 days once each. Further you would need to assume that most people don't have at least two boards they use regularly. You are even farther from getting the number of "people who play each game" (which one of the charts has as a label) since a lot of us seemingly post in threads for systems that aren't related to what we are currently playing. Going with "Most discussed RPGs" like you say in several places seems appropriately nebulous enough that it isn't misleading. And then once you have your sample and a rough research question you get all the arguments about what data is most appropriate. If it's threads, is a one post thread as good as a 1,000 post one? If it's number of posts, what happens when a few 3.5ers who are on-line at the same time manage to crank out 20 pages of posts in a day and a half arguing about wizards versus fighters? If there are lots of PF on-line games and OD&Ders like to play in person should all on-line games be excluded, or are you just going for total on-line traffic about the games? If its threads, how does "All D&D count"? If its post, how does a post talking about 4e as a counter example in a thread about a PF question count? What happens if I don't like the auto-linking ENworld does when I type Pathfinder so that I use PF instead? For posts, how does posting they wish they could give XP count versus actually gettting XP? etc... Hmmmm.... I'm getting more and more glad it isn't my project to run and that I just get to see the cool results. (Which I really enjoy, thanks!). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
What Games People Are Talking About: A Pie Chart
Top