Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What happened to "Race Matters"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goumindong" data-source="post: 4369250" data-attributes="member: 70874"><p>Racial paragon paths would be nice, but it would have to be as opposed to standard paragon paths. </p><p></p><p>One of the reasons they might not have made them was because many different classes cue on many different abilities, which means a racial class will almost never be optimal.</p><p></p><p>However, i do not like the answer that was given about doing one racial path for each "type" and so would put them into the following form for the following reasons.</p><p></p><p>1. All powers cue off of one of the racial bonus stats. This is because players are likely to make one of their racial bonus stats their secondary stats(I.E. dwarf wizards are likely to be orb or staff and pump con or wis)</p><p></p><p>2. There are no stat increases. Stat increases simply move optimal racial choices </p><p>from "good" to "best". How could anyone run a str based ranger/fighter/etc with anything other than a dragonborn if they got another +2 strength and powers that conformed to their class</p><p></p><p>3. Each racial paragon needs to have one option per combat type. So you would have "Paragon Dwarven Defender", "Paragon Dwarven Leader", "Paragon Dwarven Controller", "Paragon Dwarven Striker". Which would have a focus on abilities that fit the racial characteristics. I.E. Expanding and fulfilling racial characteristics. E.G. a Paragon Dwarven Defender might get a bonus to fort defense and immunity to poison based attacks. A Paragon Dwarven Leader might transfer the Dwarven forced movement reduction to all friendlies. A Paragon Dwarven Controller would focus on walls/knockbacks. A Paragon Dragonborn Striker would get powers that made his breath weapon awesome, A paragon Elf Leader would get lots of friendly movement powers and increase the base speed of his group by 1, etc etc etc.</p><p></p><p>4. You need to have taken at least one or possibly two racial feats in order to qualify for the class(Similar to multi-class paragon)</p><p></p><p>5. There are no paragon human options. With a floating bonus this makes it too easy to conform to any class. (I am iffy on this)</p><p></p><p>6. Half-Elf can take Elf or Half-Elf Paragons.(or human if i scrap rule 5)</p><p></p><p>That would be my base rules and now that i look at it i really want to hash it out and see how it turns out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goumindong, post: 4369250, member: 70874"] Racial paragon paths would be nice, but it would have to be as opposed to standard paragon paths. One of the reasons they might not have made them was because many different classes cue on many different abilities, which means a racial class will almost never be optimal. However, i do not like the answer that was given about doing one racial path for each "type" and so would put them into the following form for the following reasons. 1. All powers cue off of one of the racial bonus stats. This is because players are likely to make one of their racial bonus stats their secondary stats(I.E. dwarf wizards are likely to be orb or staff and pump con or wis) 2. There are no stat increases. Stat increases simply move optimal racial choices from "good" to "best". How could anyone run a str based ranger/fighter/etc with anything other than a dragonborn if they got another +2 strength and powers that conformed to their class 3. Each racial paragon needs to have one option per combat type. So you would have "Paragon Dwarven Defender", "Paragon Dwarven Leader", "Paragon Dwarven Controller", "Paragon Dwarven Striker". Which would have a focus on abilities that fit the racial characteristics. I.E. Expanding and fulfilling racial characteristics. E.G. a Paragon Dwarven Defender might get a bonus to fort defense and immunity to poison based attacks. A Paragon Dwarven Leader might transfer the Dwarven forced movement reduction to all friendlies. A Paragon Dwarven Controller would focus on walls/knockbacks. A Paragon Dragonborn Striker would get powers that made his breath weapon awesome, A paragon Elf Leader would get lots of friendly movement powers and increase the base speed of his group by 1, etc etc etc. 4. You need to have taken at least one or possibly two racial feats in order to qualify for the class(Similar to multi-class paragon) 5. There are no paragon human options. With a floating bonus this makes it too easy to conform to any class. (I am iffy on this) 6. Half-Elf can take Elf or Half-Elf Paragons.(or human if i scrap rule 5) That would be my base rules and now that i look at it i really want to hash it out and see how it turns out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What happened to "Race Matters"?
Top