Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dualazi" data-source="post: 7123443" data-attributes="member: 6855537">This seems like the epitome of making mountains of of molehills. It doesn't matter if it's included either way, as I don't think it affected the game's "inclusivity" either way. As one poster pointed out, unless your players comb through the PHB back to front they're unlikely to have noticed it in the original print anyway, and I suspect most campaigns didn't otherwise clarify what's in a deity's pants if the players themselves hadn't done research out of character.Oddly enough though, this discussion itself (and those like it elsewhere) might be reason enough to remove it. It's becoming increasingly clear that there's a vocal minority dead set on creating controversy at the slightest hint of language they don't approve of, and it's smarter for WotC to simply avoid including such things at all rather than do so and invite negative attention. I'm staunchly opposed to this course of action myself, but obviously a public company will probably try and err on the safe side of things.</blockquote>