Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What happens if we don't like it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormtower" data-source="post: 3714530" data-attributes="member: 43631"><p>Most of my local group was at GenCon for the announcement, as I was.</p><p></p><p>Brief synopsis of thoughts:</p><p></p><p>We felt talked down to with quotes like "Start thinking about wrapping up your 3.5 campaigns" and "we will help players to better understand their role in the party" (paraphrasing here) from Bill Slavicsek. WotC doesn't get to define our campaign timelines or playstyle.</p><p></p><p>We felt slapped in the face by the earliness of the announcement. Much of the 3.5 splatbook material has yet to be integrated or even sampled by our group. Several of us are heavily invested in the 3.5 minis and books.</p><p></p><p>We felt the lack of backwards compatibility was intentional on the part of WotC - who are, to my mind, some of the most talented designers in the business - to push us into 4e.</p><p></p><p>Finally, as Living Greyhawk players and DMs, we were stung by WotC's choice to drop LG from the supported campaigns and to essentially bury the Greyhawk IP.</p><p></p><p>I have enough 3.5 material in my homebrew to play for the next quarter century or more, and the OGL allows me to design my own stuff after we run out. We'll be voting with our wallets and not supporting 4e or the Insider.</p><p></p><p>3.5/OGL works for us, we feel that we have only scratched the surface of what is possible within the system for both storytelling and tactical/combat challenges, and there is no compelling reason to switch with Living Greyhawk being discontinued.</p><p></p><p>It's sad but also liberating. I know we will have a smaller pool of players from which to choose as the iterations of D&D increasingly splinter the face-to-face tabletop D&D community, but we are loyal to 3.5 and the OGL and, despite plenty of disposable income, disinclined to provide WotC with positive feedback regarding their decision to switch editions.</p><p></p><p>I will miss being active in the RPGA, but I have no doubt that there will be many others who follow a similar path. To those who are excited about 4e, I hope it is all that you want it to be. Game on!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormtower, post: 3714530, member: 43631"] Most of my local group was at GenCon for the announcement, as I was. Brief synopsis of thoughts: We felt talked down to with quotes like "Start thinking about wrapping up your 3.5 campaigns" and "we will help players to better understand their role in the party" (paraphrasing here) from Bill Slavicsek. WotC doesn't get to define our campaign timelines or playstyle. We felt slapped in the face by the earliness of the announcement. Much of the 3.5 splatbook material has yet to be integrated or even sampled by our group. Several of us are heavily invested in the 3.5 minis and books. We felt the lack of backwards compatibility was intentional on the part of WotC - who are, to my mind, some of the most talented designers in the business - to push us into 4e. Finally, as Living Greyhawk players and DMs, we were stung by WotC's choice to drop LG from the supported campaigns and to essentially bury the Greyhawk IP. I have enough 3.5 material in my homebrew to play for the next quarter century or more, and the OGL allows me to design my own stuff after we run out. We'll be voting with our wallets and not supporting 4e or the Insider. 3.5/OGL works for us, we feel that we have only scratched the surface of what is possible within the system for both storytelling and tactical/combat challenges, and there is no compelling reason to switch with Living Greyhawk being discontinued. It's sad but also liberating. I know we will have a smaller pool of players from which to choose as the iterations of D&D increasingly splinter the face-to-face tabletop D&D community, but we are loyal to 3.5 and the OGL and, despite plenty of disposable income, disinclined to provide WotC with positive feedback regarding their decision to switch editions. I will miss being active in the RPGA, but I have no doubt that there will be many others who follow a similar path. To those who are excited about 4e, I hope it is all that you want it to be. Game on! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What happens if we don't like it?
Top