Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Yair" data-source="post: 1124735" data-attributes="member: 10913">Bryan: I am afraid I don't own AU, I am merely paraphrasing the original argument. All that I know is that it is the Sibeccai Khopesh's description, which (I believe) reads:Sibeccai Khopesh: This sword's blade is straight near the hilt but ends in a curve. It is only about 2 feet long but very heavy. If using it properly, a character can add a +1 bonus on the opposed attack roll when attempting to disarm an enemy (including the opposed attack roll to avoid being disarmed himself, if he fails to disarm the enemy).Wulf: Yes, I too believe the actual Open or Closed status of the content remains unchanged (in this case, I believe, open). That is precisely my concern. I am afraid that the publishing company making use of supposedly open content, when it is in fact closed or to be precise copyrighted material not covered under the OGL, will be liable to a lawsuit on copyright infirngement.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Yair, post: 1124735, member: 10913"] Bryan: I am afraid I don't own AU, I am merely paraphrasing the original argument. All that I know is that it is the Sibeccai Khopesh's description, which (I believe) reads: [COLOR=plum][B]Sibeccai Khopesh[/B]: This sword's blade is straight near the hilt but ends in a curve. It is only about 2 feet long but very heavy. If using it properly, a character can add a +1 bonus on the opposed attack roll when attempting to disarm an enemy (including the opposed attack roll to avoid being disarmed himself, if he fails to disarm the enemy).[/COLOR] Wulf: Yes, I too believe the actual Open or Closed status of the content remains unchanged (in this case, I believe, open). That is precisely my concern. I am afraid that the publishing company making use of supposedly open content, when it is in fact closed or to be precise copyrighted material not covered under the OGL, will be liable to a lawsuit on copyright infirngement. [/QUOTE]

Verification