Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Decamber" data-source="post: 267428" data-attributes="member: 438">Crothian - That's the reasons I hate most: "because's it's in the rules". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Vaxalon - Huh? I guess I'm quite tired, but I didn't really get that. Could you explain a little? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Hmm. For simplicity's sake, let's take another more appropriate example:The strong fighter is scoring an excellent hit with his greatsword against the skeleton, however not enough to drop it (the skeleton, not the greatsword). As the fighter hit with such a great force, and aimed at running through the skeleton to cleave it, wouldn't it then be logical if he pushed the skeleton along his sword swing (assuming he didn't cleave him)?Or am I thinking too short? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></blockquote>