Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What Have We Done About Solos?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fuzzlewump" data-source="post: 4775833" data-attributes="member: 63214"><p><strong>Solo Encounters as Multiple Creatures</strong></p><p></p><p>Maybe some solo fights can instead be 5 separate creatures that are bound together: like legs, head, and tail of a dragon all having separate stats. It would give you milestones in the fight, as taking down legs or a tail would be tangible achievement, which solo encounters in general lack. As you're bashing away at 500 hit points, the only dent you put into it is the "bloodied" title. </p><p></p><p>Certainly details would have to be worked out, such as the issue of going straight for the head for the kill. One answer is to increase, substantially, the defenses of the head while the dragon's other parts are active, as they will act as defense. This could be trite and "videogamey," (Take down the ____ to reveal his weak point!) which are not really problems at my table. Another view is that the head can be targeted normally without any defense increase and "killing" it just means the dragon cannot bite or use his breath weapon anymore. From a narrative point of view, once it seems his head is in critical danger, he then uses his other parts in defense (thus attacks directed at the head after it is "killed" are randomly assigned to whatever the dragon puts in the way.) Another way is to not allow targeting of parts, and simply take down parts in a random order as his total HP ticks down. From a narrative point of view, the attack that brings his HP down far enough to kill one of his parts means that the dragon used his (roll a 1d4, or whatever, and for this example we rolled...) tail as a last defense measure, which can be seen as putting it between a sword and his neck, and the dragon loses use of the tail. The players feel the climax of achieving an important milestone, but they still have the rest of the dragon to deal with (4 more creatures, from the point of view of the dungeon master.) </p><p></p><p>Another detail is what creatures to use? Would the legs be equivalent to appropriate level brutes, and the tail to a lurker? The head, a controller? The body, a soldier? Should each act on every round, or should turns be halved and damage be doubled for certain parts?</p><p></p><p>One final issue that I just thought of is that at some points fights with multiple enemies have very clear turning points that seem irreversible. Solo fights on the other hand, retain their difficulty throughout, thus having the potential of being dangerous throughout the encounter, assuming the players thought they were dangerous to begin with. The dragon, after losing some parts can try to run away (as some adventures dictate once the dragons reach a certain point,) or perhaps go berserk and increase the damage of his remaining parts. These options equate to a "fight or flight" mechanism, which makes sense for anyone who has felt an adrenaline rush (most everyone, I think.)</p><p></p><p>I'd love to hear any thoughts. Or, feel free to direct me to a post that has posited the same things.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fuzzlewump, post: 4775833, member: 63214"] [b]Solo Encounters as Multiple Creatures[/b] Maybe some solo fights can instead be 5 separate creatures that are bound together: like legs, head, and tail of a dragon all having separate stats. It would give you milestones in the fight, as taking down legs or a tail would be tangible achievement, which solo encounters in general lack. As you're bashing away at 500 hit points, the only dent you put into it is the "bloodied" title. Certainly details would have to be worked out, such as the issue of going straight for the head for the kill. One answer is to increase, substantially, the defenses of the head while the dragon's other parts are active, as they will act as defense. This could be trite and "videogamey," (Take down the ____ to reveal his weak point!) which are not really problems at my table. Another view is that the head can be targeted normally without any defense increase and "killing" it just means the dragon cannot bite or use his breath weapon anymore. From a narrative point of view, once it seems his head is in critical danger, he then uses his other parts in defense (thus attacks directed at the head after it is "killed" are randomly assigned to whatever the dragon puts in the way.) Another way is to not allow targeting of parts, and simply take down parts in a random order as his total HP ticks down. From a narrative point of view, the attack that brings his HP down far enough to kill one of his parts means that the dragon used his (roll a 1d4, or whatever, and for this example we rolled...) tail as a last defense measure, which can be seen as putting it between a sword and his neck, and the dragon loses use of the tail. The players feel the climax of achieving an important milestone, but they still have the rest of the dragon to deal with (4 more creatures, from the point of view of the dungeon master.) Another detail is what creatures to use? Would the legs be equivalent to appropriate level brutes, and the tail to a lurker? The head, a controller? The body, a soldier? Should each act on every round, or should turns be halved and damage be doubled for certain parts? One final issue that I just thought of is that at some points fights with multiple enemies have very clear turning points that seem irreversible. Solo fights on the other hand, retain their difficulty throughout, thus having the potential of being dangerous throughout the encounter, assuming the players thought they were dangerous to begin with. The dragon, after losing some parts can try to run away (as some adventures dictate once the dragons reach a certain point,) or perhaps go berserk and increase the damage of his remaining parts. These options equate to a "fight or flight" mechanism, which makes sense for anyone who has felt an adrenaline rush (most everyone, I think.) I'd love to hear any thoughts. Or, feel free to direct me to a post that has posited the same things.:) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What Have We Done About Solos?
Top