Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doghead Thirteen" data-source="post: 3390123" data-attributes="member: 49966">Um, dude, no offence, but an attitude like that would get me asking very serious questions as to if a player belonged in my gaming group.A boosted mount is fairly obvious for higher-level charas, and it's not just Sir Holy Knight who should have one - ever heard of Dick Turpin? Now there's a Rogue if ever I saw one.And he's a Rogue who's famous for what? Riding his horse.No I'm not a 'punish the Paladin' GM. I expect players of paladin-type characters to ROLEPLAY like they're holy warriors. I don't go out of my way to make the paladin fall. I don't shove lose-lose decisions in their faces. I let the player determine what is and isn't on for their paladin-type character, then expect them to STICK WITH IT.Saying a paladin should be the only character class with a 'cool' mount is (IMHO) a bit like saying the Fighter should be the only class allowed a + on their sword.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doghead Thirteen, post: 3390123, member: 49966"] Um, dude, no offence, but an attitude like that would get me asking very serious questions as to if a player belonged in my gaming group. A boosted mount is fairly obvious for higher-level charas, and it's not just Sir Holy Knight who should have one - ever heard of Dick Turpin? Now there's a Rogue if ever I saw one. And he's a Rogue who's famous for what? Riding his horse. No I'm not a 'punish the Paladin' GM. I expect players of paladin-type characters to ROLEPLAY like they're holy warriors. I don't go out of my way to make the paladin fall. I don't shove lose-lose decisions in their faces. I let the player determine what is and isn't on for their paladin-type character, then expect them to STICK WITH IT. Saying a paladin should be the only character class with a 'cool' mount is (IMHO) a bit like saying the Fighter should be the only class allowed a + on their sword. [/QUOTE]

Verification