Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What I Love Best and What I Hate Worst about D&D5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ren1999" data-source="post: 6461317" data-attributes="member: 85179"><p>I love the basic mechanics of skills. It is logical and doesn't get in the way of storytelling. I think that when DMs and Players really get into it, players can Goog the real way to perform those skills and describe it to the DM and party so everyone can really learn those skills during play.</p><p></p><p>I hate how the Medicine and Medicine Kit skills work. They should be combined. Thieves Tools could use some work.</p><p></p><p>I love the chosen races in the Player's handbook. Everybody gets to play their favorite characters from past editions. I think a full-blood Dragonborn and Tiefling should be changed to half-blood though just like the Half-Orc. In the Baldur's Gate comic, we don't see Dragonborns or Tieflings anywhere in the story probably for this reason.</p><p></p><p>I hate a few mechanics of the races. 1.) Though giving ability increases is traditional with races, it encourages meta-gaming. Some players will always play certain races for that ability score+ factor. They will never try to play a new race. Moving the ability increases to class will fix that. 2.) There are too many class and race benefits. They are cluttered and somewhat hard to justify. How about just 1 or 2 benefits according to what type they are? Rogue Dex+1, Dex+Proficiency, Stealth+Expertise, 3 other Skills+Proficiency, Why does a Wizard have Religion as a choice of skills for example? Why does a Rogue have an intelligence proficiency bonus? 3.) Some of these benefits are organized alphabetically for easier reference and some of them are not. Why? 4.) Get rid of the term "Sub-Race".</p><p></p><p>2 handed, and secondary and primary weapon damage works great and is balanced now. I love it. But some weapons don't do enough damage and other weapons that are less lethal do more damage. I really think weapon damage according to class makes more sense. Calling weapons Martial and Simple, makes no sense. Heavy, Medium, Light weapons make more sense.</p><p></p><p>I love Maneuvers and Reactons and I think there should be more! Some boring monsters can be made more interesting by adding their own Maneuvers and Reactions! Feats and Maneuvers should be combined. There should be no ability increases in Feats. We've got level-up rewards for that.</p><p></p><p>I love Hit Points now. If you roll low, you can take average hit points. You aren't stuck with a 1 HP increase that level.</p><p></p><p>I love the variant organization of the game. It saved this game. I worked on some variants already so that I can DM the game I want and the players can agree on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ren1999, post: 6461317, member: 85179"] I love the basic mechanics of skills. It is logical and doesn't get in the way of storytelling. I think that when DMs and Players really get into it, players can Goog the real way to perform those skills and describe it to the DM and party so everyone can really learn those skills during play. I hate how the Medicine and Medicine Kit skills work. They should be combined. Thieves Tools could use some work. I love the chosen races in the Player's handbook. Everybody gets to play their favorite characters from past editions. I think a full-blood Dragonborn and Tiefling should be changed to half-blood though just like the Half-Orc. In the Baldur's Gate comic, we don't see Dragonborns or Tieflings anywhere in the story probably for this reason. I hate a few mechanics of the races. 1.) Though giving ability increases is traditional with races, it encourages meta-gaming. Some players will always play certain races for that ability score+ factor. They will never try to play a new race. Moving the ability increases to class will fix that. 2.) There are too many class and race benefits. They are cluttered and somewhat hard to justify. How about just 1 or 2 benefits according to what type they are? Rogue Dex+1, Dex+Proficiency, Stealth+Expertise, 3 other Skills+Proficiency, Why does a Wizard have Religion as a choice of skills for example? Why does a Rogue have an intelligence proficiency bonus? 3.) Some of these benefits are organized alphabetically for easier reference and some of them are not. Why? 4.) Get rid of the term "Sub-Race". 2 handed, and secondary and primary weapon damage works great and is balanced now. I love it. But some weapons don't do enough damage and other weapons that are less lethal do more damage. I really think weapon damage according to class makes more sense. Calling weapons Martial and Simple, makes no sense. Heavy, Medium, Light weapons make more sense. I love Maneuvers and Reactons and I think there should be more! Some boring monsters can be made more interesting by adding their own Maneuvers and Reactions! Feats and Maneuvers should be combined. There should be no ability increases in Feats. We've got level-up rewards for that. I love Hit Points now. If you roll low, you can take average hit points. You aren't stuck with a 1 HP increase that level. I love the variant organization of the game. It saved this game. I worked on some variants already so that I can DM the game I want and the players can agree on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What I Love Best and What I Hate Worst about D&D5
Top