Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If....4E had been a modular option sub-set for 3.5?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 6238462" data-attributes="member: 95493"><p>Well yeah, this is kind of what I thought too. As I said, it seems like those most chomping at the bit for 4e was those who were dissatisfied with 3e - either those who were playing and unhappy, or those who were not playing. But ether case the main demographic seems to be only those who did not enjoy the 3e style. That is why I'm very sure that 4e simply would have not worked for 3e. And that certainly it uses different math, should have been built from the ground up, and what not - all of the things that only come with a new edition of the game.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah, I don't think 4e would have worked as an add-on to 3e. I think it also would have done better if it had slaughtered fewer sacred cows and worked harder to incorporate the existing fan-base and history of the game. I think that these are things they are trying to do with 5e, but we'll see how successfully they do. I fear the damage may be done for a lot of gamers - I know people in my circle simply won't try anything WotC releases at this point even if it says 5e on the tin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tovec, post: 6238462, member: 95493"] Well yeah, this is kind of what I thought too. As I said, it seems like those most chomping at the bit for 4e was those who were dissatisfied with 3e - either those who were playing and unhappy, or those who were not playing. But ether case the main demographic seems to be only those who did not enjoy the 3e style. That is why I'm very sure that 4e simply would have not worked for 3e. And that certainly it uses different math, should have been built from the ground up, and what not - all of the things that only come with a new edition of the game. So, yeah, I don't think 4e would have worked as an add-on to 3e. I think it also would have done better if it had slaughtered fewer sacred cows and worked harder to incorporate the existing fan-base and history of the game. I think that these are things they are trying to do with 5e, but we'll see how successfully they do. I fear the damage may be done for a lot of gamers - I know people in my circle simply won't try anything WotC releases at this point even if it says 5e on the tin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If....4E had been a modular option sub-set for 3.5?
Top