Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If....4E had been a modular option sub-set for 3.5?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scrivener of Doom" data-source="post: 6238597" data-attributes="member: 87576"><p>Like others, I think 4E is radically different enough to 3.5E that it couldn't/wouldn't work as a modular option: it really is its own game.</p><p></p><p>What I do sometimes wonder, though, is if WotC would have been better off taking a more Saga-like approach to 3.5E and creating 4E that way. Even though I am happy with 4E and would never go back to 3.5E - or, worse, devolve to Next - I can imagine a tidied up ruleset for 3.5E that might have been more successful than 4E.</p><p></p><p> However, I don't think it was just 4E's rules that killed the edition. Clearly the crappy opening adventures - particularly those two with Mike Mearls name on them - killed a lot of enthusiasm for the new edition and for 4E and Paizo was waiting there with open arms and products that many seem to find superior.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's all pointless navel-gazing now. We had 4E, we're about to get Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Third Edition and who knows what will happen next. (I do hope Next will be successful simply because I want my 4E DDi tools to remain online.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To be fair he began with "There's an old southern saying..." which, in my experience, means that what follows is going to make no sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scrivener of Doom, post: 6238597, member: 87576"] Like others, I think 4E is radically different enough to 3.5E that it couldn't/wouldn't work as a modular option: it really is its own game. What I do sometimes wonder, though, is if WotC would have been better off taking a more Saga-like approach to 3.5E and creating 4E that way. Even though I am happy with 4E and would never go back to 3.5E - or, worse, devolve to Next - I can imagine a tidied up ruleset for 3.5E that might have been more successful than 4E. However, I don't think it was just 4E's rules that killed the edition. Clearly the crappy opening adventures - particularly those two with Mike Mearls name on them - killed a lot of enthusiasm for the new edition and for 4E and Paizo was waiting there with open arms and products that many seem to find superior. Anyway, that's all pointless navel-gazing now. We had 4E, we're about to get Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Third Edition and who knows what will happen next. (I do hope Next will be successful simply because I want my 4E DDi tools to remain online.) To be fair he began with "There's an old southern saying..." which, in my experience, means that what follows is going to make no sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If....4E had been a modular option sub-set for 3.5?
Top