Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If?: Advancing The Eberron Metaplot
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kaodi" data-source="post: 6132409" data-attributes="member: 1231"><p>First of all, let me premise this thread with this: <em>Don't do it!</em> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>That said, I was reading the first several pages of the Planescape thread and I had an idea that I just wanted to throw out there as a conversational piece: </p><p></p><p>What if we took inspiration from the genesis of the Eberron campaign setting, the campaign setting search, and iterated on that for advancing the metaplot? Have an "Eberron Metaplot Search" with a few basic rules: Keith Baker may not enter (and maybe not judge) because he is too authoritative on the issue for this experiment to function properly, and the base year cannot be advanced by a number of years greater than that between the Day of Mourning and the default year of the campaign setting, which I believe is four. The final result would be more or less decided by fans themselves, perhaps by some kind of ranked ballot.</p><p></p><p>With this method you could probably weed out the things most fans of other established settings hated about their metaplot advancements: setting changing apocalypses. Though people would be free to submit metaplots that have those; they would just be unlikely to be selected. You would get four main categories of metaplots: date is before 1000 YK and there has yet to be an "apocalypse"; date is before 1000 YK and there has already been an "apocalypse"; date is after 1000 YK and there has yet to be an apocalypse; and date is after 1000 YK and there was an apocalypse when the millennium turned. The winner would, I think, <em>probably</em> come from the first group, but I would not rule out the third out of hand.</p><p></p><p>Other than that, there would still be a division between metaplots where somewhat major things happen (i.e. some characters die, other emerge) and those where things have remained on the razor's edge without falling off, where perhaps the pressure has been ratcheted up in some places but they have no boiled over. I think there would be a lot of potential to see great play between those with cool ideas and those who are skillful at manipulating the setting without changing its core much at all.</p><p></p><p>It would be interesting to see the result I think, and compare the reaction to those that other settings' changed have incurred.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kaodi, post: 6132409, member: 1231"] First of all, let me premise this thread with this: [I]Don't do it![/I] ;) That said, I was reading the first several pages of the Planescape thread and I had an idea that I just wanted to throw out there as a conversational piece: What if we took inspiration from the genesis of the Eberron campaign setting, the campaign setting search, and iterated on that for advancing the metaplot? Have an "Eberron Metaplot Search" with a few basic rules: Keith Baker may not enter (and maybe not judge) because he is too authoritative on the issue for this experiment to function properly, and the base year cannot be advanced by a number of years greater than that between the Day of Mourning and the default year of the campaign setting, which I believe is four. The final result would be more or less decided by fans themselves, perhaps by some kind of ranked ballot. With this method you could probably weed out the things most fans of other established settings hated about their metaplot advancements: setting changing apocalypses. Though people would be free to submit metaplots that have those; they would just be unlikely to be selected. You would get four main categories of metaplots: date is before 1000 YK and there has yet to be an "apocalypse"; date is before 1000 YK and there has already been an "apocalypse"; date is after 1000 YK and there has yet to be an apocalypse; and date is after 1000 YK and there was an apocalypse when the millennium turned. The winner would, I think, [I]probably[/I] come from the first group, but I would not rule out the third out of hand. Other than that, there would still be a division between metaplots where somewhat major things happen (i.e. some characters die, other emerge) and those where things have remained on the razor's edge without falling off, where perhaps the pressure has been ratcheted up in some places but they have no boiled over. I think there would be a lot of potential to see great play between those with cool ideas and those who are skillful at manipulating the setting without changing its core much at all. It would be interesting to see the result I think, and compare the reaction to those that other settings' changed have incurred. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What If?: Advancing The Eberron Metaplot
Top