Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8723682" data-attributes="member: 22779">I have to admit, I find the whole caster/fighter split to be rather overblown.&nbsp; Yes, I think casters might be a bit stronger than non-casters, but, overall?&nbsp; It just hasn't seemed to have much of an impact.&nbsp; I do have a larger issue with the fact that 5e is just SO heavy magic.&nbsp; Like, spells every single round from every single spell caster.&nbsp; Which has meant that the players automatically default to casting spells to solve every problem rather than trying to use skills.&nbsp; But overall?&nbsp; No, I don't really see the issue in play.Plus, from what evidence we have, fighters are by far the most popular class, but, also, none of the classes are dominating.&nbsp; The spread between top and bottom for what is being played is pretty small, so, I'd say that all theory crafting aside, judging from the evidence, this really isn't much of an issue.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8723682, member: 22779"] I have to admit, I find the whole caster/fighter split to be rather overblown. Yes, I think casters might be a bit stronger than non-casters, but, overall? It just hasn't seemed to have much of an impact. I do have a larger issue with the fact that 5e is just SO heavy magic. Like, spells every single round from every single spell caster. Which has meant that the players automatically default to casting spells to solve every problem rather than trying to use skills. But overall? No, I don't really see the issue in play. Plus, from what evidence we have, fighters are by far the most popular class, but, also, none of the classes are dominating. The spread between top and bottom for what is being played is pretty small, so, I'd say that all theory crafting aside, judging from the evidence, this really isn't much of an issue. [/QUOTE]

Verification