Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="awayfarer" data-source="post: 3435851" data-attributes="member: 42702">I'm allowing it in my upcoming Eberron campaign with a couple of minor nerfs. I removed Weapon Aptitude and they're not allowed to pick fighter bonus feats. I also gave fighters a bump by giving them all of their fighter-only feats for free at roughly the levels that they would recieve them normally.My beef with the Warblade is three-fold.1: It looks like it was designed by the dm's kid brother with the sole intent of being &quot;uber&quot;2: The flavor text behind it is just garbage. &quot;Hi, I love violence because I'm good at it because I love it!&quot;3: It was asinine to give it another classes features, by which I am specifically referring to fighter bonus feats. It'd be like making another core class with all the stats of a barbarian, only with a slew of other features and a stance progression tacked on.I should state that I actually like the Bo9S classes and the maneuver/stance progression in general.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="awayfarer, post: 3435851, member: 42702"] I'm allowing it in my upcoming Eberron campaign with a couple of minor nerfs. I removed Weapon Aptitude and they're not allowed to pick fighter bonus feats. I also gave fighters a bump by giving them all of their fighter-only feats for free at roughly the levels that they would recieve them normally. My beef with the Warblade is three-fold. 1: It looks like it was designed by the dm's kid brother with the sole intent of being "uber" 2: The flavor text behind it is just garbage. "Hi, I love violence because I'm good at it because I love it!" 3: It was asinine to give it another classes features, by which I am specifically referring to fighter bonus feats. It'd be like making another core class with all the stats of a barbarian, only with a slew of other features and a stance progression tacked on. I should state that I actually like the Bo9S classes and the maneuver/stance progression in general. [/QUOTE]

Verification