Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What if Expertise were a simple +2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7504743" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>The difference is in play, you want combat to have a moderate miss chance. And unless you die, you can repeat the check again during your next turn with little or no penalty due to having missed. Missing once in combat doesn't majorly alter the narrative.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, for skills, a single missed check can change the story. And you may not get a second chance. So while there should be a chance of failure, the odds should be different as the results are different. </p><p></p><p>Plus, all characters have roughly comparable success rates for combat. A mage hitting with a spell and warrior hitting with a weapon have the same odds of success. But skilled characters <em>should </em>have higher chances of success than unskilled. Excluding Expertise, the bonuses of a proficient character are not that much higher than an non-proficient one; for most of the game, Ability scores will matter more, so the Wizard might be better at Religion than the cleric just because they're smarter. Given the swingy nature of the die, if everyone in the party rolls the check (because everyone can) then the odds of the person who chose to specialise and train in that skill getting the highest result, is likely 1:3. It only gets higher if you can synergize with Ability Score and proficiency, but even then a lucky roll can make someone "better" at the task than you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 7504743, member: 37579"] The difference is in play, you want combat to have a moderate miss chance. And unless you die, you can repeat the check again during your next turn with little or no penalty due to having missed. Missing once in combat doesn't majorly alter the narrative. Meanwhile, for skills, a single missed check can change the story. And you may not get a second chance. So while there should be a chance of failure, the odds should be different as the results are different. Plus, all characters have roughly comparable success rates for combat. A mage hitting with a spell and warrior hitting with a weapon have the same odds of success. But skilled characters [I]should [/I]have higher chances of success than unskilled. Excluding Expertise, the bonuses of a proficient character are not that much higher than an non-proficient one; for most of the game, Ability scores will matter more, so the Wizard might be better at Religion than the cleric just because they're smarter. Given the swingy nature of the die, if everyone in the party rolls the check (because everyone can) then the odds of the person who chose to specialise and train in that skill getting the highest result, is likely 1:3. It only gets higher if you can synergize with Ability Score and proficiency, but even then a lucky roll can make someone "better" at the task than you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What if Expertise were a simple +2?
Top