Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7510157" data-attributes="member: 6919838">This is where we see the problem of communication being so very clear in theory but not practice.You made in a single post a sarcastic reference to a system that rewarded better communication with the gm *and* a system which removes that need by allowing the player to decide on their own what proficiency - to handle the expressed issue of describing in a way to make it clear enough which proficiency was used.I respond to the former part about communication keyed systems  and now you ho back to the non-communication players-choice proficiency system, it seems.All of which to me reinforces my point - if as was noted earlier- the dependence on player skill at communications can have so strong an impact as to keep proficiencies from being used due to the word-fu of the player - that's not a system I find worthwhile.</blockquote>