Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What if Expertise were a simple +2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7510801" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>"loosened but you sprain/strain... "</p><p></p><p>PHB</p><p>" If the total equals or exceeds the DC, the ability check is a success — the creature overcomes the challenge at hand. Otherwise, it's a failure, which means the character or monster makes no progress toward the objective or makes progress combined with a setback determined by the DM."</p><p></p><p>Now just in case you missed it... making the role "overcomes the challenge at hand"</p><p></p><p>Not making the role means "makes no progress toward the objective or makes progress combined with a setback determined by the DM."</p><p></p><p>So that is *not* saying the setback comes with overcoming the challenge at hand like a successful roll would (your free but bruised)... but that it makes progress towards that objective and a setback and so... once again since it was apparently missed...</p><p></p><p>""<strong>loosened </strong>but you sprain/strain... "</p><p></p><p>is that clearer? A little? </p><p></p><p>How many more "progress toward" and setback failures before we get to the equivalent as a successful roll? that would clearly depend on the manacles and the Gm buit i tend to default to three unless I have a compelling reason to deviate from my norm.</p><p></p><p>As for your position that if one uses the second of two options from the straight up standard definition of failed skill check from the primary book and sections on skill check means a failure of the system in some way... well, IDK why is the first otion "makes no progress" not a failure in the system if the second option in the same sentence is? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Nevermind, you can have your own definition for "does not work" which includes using the second half of a sentence instead of the first and that is just fine.</p><p></p><p>Me, i would expect to definitely see some problems in tasks if a Gm chose to throw out some of the most basic rules for them - but thats just me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7510801, member: 6919838"] "loosened but you sprain/strain... " PHB " If the total equals or exceeds the DC, the ability check is a success — the creature overcomes the challenge at hand. Otherwise, it's a failure, which means the character or monster makes no progress toward the objective or makes progress combined with a setback determined by the DM." Now just in case you missed it... making the role "overcomes the challenge at hand" Not making the role means "makes no progress toward the objective or makes progress combined with a setback determined by the DM." So that is *not* saying the setback comes with overcoming the challenge at hand like a successful roll would (your free but bruised)... but that it makes progress towards that objective and a setback and so... once again since it was apparently missed... ""[B]loosened [/B]but you sprain/strain... " is that clearer? A little? How many more "progress toward" and setback failures before we get to the equivalent as a successful roll? that would clearly depend on the manacles and the Gm buit i tend to default to three unless I have a compelling reason to deviate from my norm. As for your position that if one uses the second of two options from the straight up standard definition of failed skill check from the primary book and sections on skill check means a failure of the system in some way... well, IDK why is the first otion "makes no progress" not a failure in the system if the second option in the same sentence is? Nevermind, you can have your own definition for "does not work" which includes using the second half of a sentence instead of the first and that is just fine. Me, i would expect to definitely see some problems in tasks if a Gm chose to throw out some of the most basic rules for them - but thats just me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What if Expertise were a simple +2?
Top