Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shiroiken" data-source="post: 8609283" data-attributes="member: 6775477">All classes get their subclass at level 1 or 3, and I don't really care which. Either level 1-2 are just apprentice levels experienced players ignore, of everyone's a hero at level 1. The current system drives me nuts.Barbarian - largely keep it the same, although I'd like to rename it the berserker, axing the sub-class.Bard - half caster with non-spell based buffs and debuffsCleric - mostly keep it the same, but make Light Armor the default, rather than MediumDruid - since I conceptually hate the Moon Druid, my changes would be hugely unpopular, and so I'll ignore this.Fighter - bringing back the martial dice from the playtest!Monk - I'd simply axe the class. I've never been fond of it, and find that it doesn't work well in most non-asian settings.Paladin - smite is all done by spells, not just used after hitting a creature.Ranger - rework favored enemy to be useful in combat (proficiency modifier to damage most likely) and increase number of favored terrains until a 20th level ranger had all of them (as well as a lot of favored enemies). Beastmaster would need an overhaul to work similar to the new summon spells.Rogue - not much really needed, but I'd make assassin better in combat and add a thug subclass that doesn't need finesse weapons.Sorcerer - I'd probably axe this one too, unless I could find a way to make it significantly different from the Wizard. I'd review the playtest version for ideasWarlock - Int based class. I'd rework the Sword Boon and Hexblade to basically be the same thing (serving an intelligent weapon is stupid IMO).Wizard - get rid of school based sub-classes, focusing on archetypes (Beguiler, Battlemage, Summoner, etc).If I could change the multiclass rules, I'd ditch them for multiclass based subclasses.</blockquote>

Verification