Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is a Social challenge, anyways?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M_Natas" data-source="post: 8963212" data-attributes="member: 7025918"><p>Because in Combat, you declare an action, the outcome is determined and than the action and outcome are described:</p><p>"I attack the Orc with my sword."</p><p>"Roll an attack."</p><p>"That's a 19."</p><p>"That's a hit, roll damage."</p><p>"10 Damage"</p><p>"Nice, tou all see, that Fin the Fighter draws his Sword, swinging at the Orc. The Orc tries to raise its shield, but it is to slow. Fin slashes wide open a big wound in the chest of the Orc, who growls in Pain."</p><p></p><p>In a social interaction, usually the action is described first, and based on that action and outcome is determined:</p><p>"Fin says to the orc: stand away or I will cut you!"</p><p>"Make an intimidation check"</p><p>"It is a 6"</p><p>"The Orc laughed and raises his Axe. Everybody, roll initiative."</p><p></p><p>So, in Combat, we have the Action declaration, the outcome determination and than the action and outcome description.</p><p>In social interactions we have usally the action declaration including the action description, then the outcome determination and then the outcome description.</p><p></p><p>For social interactions that can lead to a dissonance.</p><p>Like a players gives the best speech and roleplaying performance ever that in reality would make any king give up his kingdom, but than he rolls a Nat 1 and his character gets killed.</p><p>In Combat, the outcome is first described and then based on that, the action is described. If he rolled a 1 on the attack rolled, "Fin fumbled with the sword and couldn't bring it to bear against the orc" or a natural 20 "Fin, with on swing, hacks the Head off of the orc."</p><p></p><p>So, in 5e, if not be done carefully by the DM, how I describe my action in an social interaction doesn't have any bearing on the outcome. If I roll a nat 1, nothing what I said mattered. I failed.</p><p></p><p>Of course ... you could put the roll in front of the action description. Handle it like combat: declare an action, but don't describe it, with for the outcome determination and then describe the action based on the outcome.</p><p>"I want to intimidate the Orc"</p><p>"Make an intimidation check"</p><p>"20!"</p><p>Now he can describe a coom phrase. If he rolled a 1, he could describe how he stuttered and couldn't get the words out to really intimidate the orc.</p><p></p><p>But ... seperating the action declaration and the action description in social interactions kills any ryhthm. It slows it down to a crawl.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M_Natas, post: 8963212, member: 7025918"] Because in Combat, you declare an action, the outcome is determined and than the action and outcome are described: "I attack the Orc with my sword." "Roll an attack." "That's a 19." "That's a hit, roll damage." "10 Damage" "Nice, tou all see, that Fin the Fighter draws his Sword, swinging at the Orc. The Orc tries to raise its shield, but it is to slow. Fin slashes wide open a big wound in the chest of the Orc, who growls in Pain." In a social interaction, usually the action is described first, and based on that action and outcome is determined: "Fin says to the orc: stand away or I will cut you!" "Make an intimidation check" "It is a 6" "The Orc laughed and raises his Axe. Everybody, roll initiative." So, in Combat, we have the Action declaration, the outcome determination and than the action and outcome description. In social interactions we have usally the action declaration including the action description, then the outcome determination and then the outcome description. For social interactions that can lead to a dissonance. Like a players gives the best speech and roleplaying performance ever that in reality would make any king give up his kingdom, but than he rolls a Nat 1 and his character gets killed. In Combat, the outcome is first described and then based on that, the action is described. If he rolled a 1 on the attack rolled, "Fin fumbled with the sword and couldn't bring it to bear against the orc" or a natural 20 "Fin, with on swing, hacks the Head off of the orc." So, in 5e, if not be done carefully by the DM, how I describe my action in an social interaction doesn't have any bearing on the outcome. If I roll a nat 1, nothing what I said mattered. I failed. Of course ... you could put the roll in front of the action description. Handle it like combat: declare an action, but don't describe it, with for the outcome determination and then describe the action based on the outcome. "I want to intimidate the Orc" "Make an intimidation check" "20!" Now he can describe a coom phrase. If he rolled a 1, he could describe how he stuttered and couldn't get the words out to really intimidate the orc. But ... seperating the action declaration and the action description in social interactions kills any ryhthm. It slows it down to a crawl. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is a Social challenge, anyways?
Top