Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="James Gasik" data-source="post: 9489093" data-attributes="member: 6877472">I don't know that I'd want WotC to make more classes.  That isn't to say that I wouldn't want more classes, but their designers seem to have problems with the classes that they have, and this is the same company that cranked out such fun things as the Complete Warrior Samurai and the Hexblade...and then turning around and giving us the Archivist.Or in 4e, where the quality of new classes beyond the PHB (and well, even in the PHB, the Paladin needed support) was extremely suspect- Psionic Defenders who can't hit with opportunity attacks, the original Assassin with it's backloaded damage mechanic, Sorcerers with worse damage powers than Wizards (despite one being a Striker and the other a Controller), and the hot mess that was the Essentials Warlock all come to mind.Even in 5e, the Artificer isn't fully baked, and seeing as how we're in a thread devoted to the ongoing saga of the Ranger, would we really want these people to give us a book with five new classes and 10-15 subclasses for those classes?</blockquote>