Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 8353275" data-attributes="member: 20323">I don't think you need any more fuel on your fire concerning Faction War. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I tend to be an optimist and take people at their word, unless they've given me reason to do otherwise, and even then I look for the best in people. I guess that makes me an outlier on internet discussion boards. Anyhow, that preface was to clarify that I did take Monte Cook on his word when he posted years ago about Faction War supposed to have had a followup adventure to weave the factions back into Sigil, but it was interrupted by the PS product line ending. I know I dug up the quote years ago and linked it on ENWorld, but don't feel like it right now. I believe you have a strongly dissenting opinion, however?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 8353275, member: 20323"] I don't think you need any more fuel on your fire concerning Faction War. ;) I tend to be an optimist and take people at their word, unless they've given me reason to do otherwise, and even then I look for the best in people. I guess that makes me an outlier on internet discussion boards. Anyhow, that preface was to clarify that I did take Monte Cook on his word when he posted years ago about Faction War supposed to have had a followup adventure to weave the factions back into Sigil, but it was interrupted by the PS product line ending. I know I dug up the quote years ago and linked it on ENWorld, but don't feel like it right now. I believe you have a strongly dissenting opinion, however? [/QUOTE]

Verification