Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is "gamist"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Balesir" data-source="post: 5965153" data-attributes="member: 27160"><p>There are those who claim that, sure. I treat their claims much as I do pretty much any group who claim to have a monopoly on "truth"; the claims are bunk, but that doesn't mean that what they are sold on doesn't have some value held in it.</p><p></p><p>Well, other than that my personal experience suggests to me that it's extremely hard to impossible to address more than one agenda <strong>at the same time</strong>, it's pretty clear that this is rubbish. The suggestion that all individuals have a "preferred" or "naturally inclined" agenda also runs directly counter to my experience. So, someone may have written it, but that doesn't mean it's true. Then again, lots of things have been written about science, too - and many of them are also incorrect.</p><p></p><p>I think this view is completely supportable; there are many potential sets of axes one can use. I have never found the ones used in the WotC survey analysis useful to really tell me things that help me run a game, but that doesn't mean that there aren't other axes I would find more useful - I just haven't found them, yet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Balesir, post: 5965153, member: 27160"] There are those who claim that, sure. I treat their claims much as I do pretty much any group who claim to have a monopoly on "truth"; the claims are bunk, but that doesn't mean that what they are sold on doesn't have some value held in it. Well, other than that my personal experience suggests to me that it's extremely hard to impossible to address more than one agenda [B]at the same time[/B], it's pretty clear that this is rubbish. The suggestion that all individuals have a "preferred" or "naturally inclined" agenda also runs directly counter to my experience. So, someone may have written it, but that doesn't mean it's true. Then again, lots of things have been written about science, too - and many of them are also incorrect. I think this view is completely supportable; there are many potential sets of axes one can use. I have never found the ones used in the WotC survey analysis useful to really tell me things that help me run a game, but that doesn't mean that there aren't other axes I would find more useful - I just haven't found them, yet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is "gamist"?
Top