Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is good for D&D as a game vs. what is good for the company that makes it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 5715044" data-attributes="member: 14159"><p>That model of "edition churn" falls apart when your existing customer base refuses to buy the new books because they have an existing product they are satisfied with and won't buy a new edition just because it is new and different. I think we've seen the first show of that with the 3.5e/PF vs. 4e Schism. I think a 5e coming out soon will risk the same thing happening. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is, that as a game, D&D doesn't need steady sales, it needs it as a profitable product. Hence the whole concept of the thread.</p><p></p><p>You can play for many years on just the 3 core books of virtually any edition. If all I had was the core 3 for 3.5e, I could run games on that for the rest of my life, everything else is optional. . .and realizing that is WotC's nightmare because it kills sales.</p><p></p><p>I've seen a number of gaming groups that still play or played for many years niche product books that only had one or two books released for them, with no more support ever, or that play what was once a well supported game but hasn't had books released in many years. The need for "support" in the form of new supplements and web information is illusory, it is just that: supplementary. </p><p></p><p>In fact, I've noticed a pattern over many games, not just D&D, that as more and more products come out the complexity of the game rises, the difficulty of GM'ing rises, and the barrier to entry for a new player rises. If/when a new edition comes along, then there is the tough choice to effectively lose the hundreds (or even thousands) spent on buying books, or move to the new edition along with "everybody else", although you don't need to buy it to keep playing as long as your players are satisfied with the system as-is and want to keep on playing as if nothing changed.</p><p></p><p>It's this train of thought which lead me to create the thread, the realization that D&D as a game does not need a constant stream of new supplementary books every month, and new editions every few years, to be playable and enjoyable. It only needs those things for business reasons as the product of a publicly traded company that has to be accountable to stockholders for record profits every quarter, not for the quality of the game being playable and fun.</p><p></p><p>I first realized it circa 2005, when I realized that I was buying all the various D&D 3.x products, but I'd never get close to using them all, I'd buy a new $40 book to read through it for stuff to use in a game, but I'd probably never use more than one or two feats or spells from it. . .and I couldn't afford to keep doing it. As I've watched D&D and the gaming industry as a whole progress in the 6 years since then, I've continued to hold this philosophy the more things I've seen happen in the gaming world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingsandsword, post: 5715044, member: 14159"] That model of "edition churn" falls apart when your existing customer base refuses to buy the new books because they have an existing product they are satisfied with and won't buy a new edition just because it is new and different. I think we've seen the first show of that with the 3.5e/PF vs. 4e Schism. I think a 5e coming out soon will risk the same thing happening. The problem is, that as a game, D&D doesn't need steady sales, it needs it as a profitable product. Hence the whole concept of the thread. You can play for many years on just the 3 core books of virtually any edition. If all I had was the core 3 for 3.5e, I could run games on that for the rest of my life, everything else is optional. . .and realizing that is WotC's nightmare because it kills sales. I've seen a number of gaming groups that still play or played for many years niche product books that only had one or two books released for them, with no more support ever, or that play what was once a well supported game but hasn't had books released in many years. The need for "support" in the form of new supplements and web information is illusory, it is just that: supplementary. In fact, I've noticed a pattern over many games, not just D&D, that as more and more products come out the complexity of the game rises, the difficulty of GM'ing rises, and the barrier to entry for a new player rises. If/when a new edition comes along, then there is the tough choice to effectively lose the hundreds (or even thousands) spent on buying books, or move to the new edition along with "everybody else", although you don't need to buy it to keep playing as long as your players are satisfied with the system as-is and want to keep on playing as if nothing changed. It's this train of thought which lead me to create the thread, the realization that D&D as a game does not need a constant stream of new supplementary books every month, and new editions every few years, to be playable and enjoyable. It only needs those things for business reasons as the product of a publicly traded company that has to be accountable to stockholders for record profits every quarter, not for the quality of the game being playable and fun. I first realized it circa 2005, when I realized that I was buying all the various D&D 3.x products, but I'd never get close to using them all, I'd buy a new $40 book to read through it for stuff to use in a game, but I'd probably never use more than one or two feats or spells from it. . .and I couldn't afford to keep doing it. As I've watched D&D and the gaming industry as a whole progress in the 6 years since then, I've continued to hold this philosophy the more things I've seen happen in the gaming world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is good for D&D as a game vs. what is good for the company that makes it
Top